News   Apr 03, 2020
 9.1K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.3K     0 

Municipal Politics

"“Really, the whole city is screaming, ‘We don’t want this in our mature neighbourhoods,'” she said."

The change doesn’t convince Wanda Banas.

While Edmonton has various plans in the works hoping to encourage more people to ride their bikes and take transit, Banas worries her freedom to drive a car could be curtailed. She sees council’s plans to expand the bike lane network, despite the city’s cold winters, as a signal their priorities don’t align with hers.

“That’s why there’s the mistrust, because you’re doing something that’s illogical because it’s part of some plan that you’re following.”

Her experience with a redevelopment next door also fuels her mistrust. Plans to replace houses with an apartment complex will block sunlight on her property and make it difficult to see around the corner when she’s leaving her driveway.

“I’m going to be sitting in the dark,” she said. “I don’t get sunlight, ever, in the afternoon or evening. Never again … what about my plants? What about my trees? Will they survive?”

“That’s my quality of life, and this was supposed to be my retirement place to live. So I can’t age in place, not anymore, not with any comfort. I have to decide if I have to go somewhere and start over.”

Yeah these people can get bent
 
I wish I was an Edmonton Journal contributor because I would write the most pro-urbanist takes to get that angry click/comment traffic.

“Why you should use scooters instead of cars”
“Downtown isn’t what the right makes it out to be”
“Denny’s is overrated”
 


Sounds like 4 of the complaints of harassment and 1 of discrimination have been substantiated by integrity commissioner - report coming Aug. 21.

However, Edmonton Coun. Jennifer Rice is asking for court orders to stop city council from sanctioning her for breaking council’s code of conduct and to throw out an investigative report alleging she harassed and discriminated against one of her former employees.
 
Politics makes strange bedfellows.

Janz and taxpayers federation uniting against provincial money to benefit OEG.

But what's potential benefit to taxpayers? I'd likw to know exactly what we're talking about.

 
Last edited:
Not saying right or wrong but on the surface, Edmonton could seem like a weird place that makes some puzzling choices. Or just very principled. Some examples.

How many cities have a chance to elect a premier representing your city and decide to vote them out? Case in point - voting out Don Getty in 1989 when Conservatives were going to win regardless. As an aside, Edmonton won't likely be home to future premier for a long while.

Minister of Natural Resources and Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan - endorsed by oil industry and one of the most powerful politicans in country from our city and she could only ever win by the skin of her teeth. If it wasn't for Oliver community, where she won big, she would have never been elected.

A major company wants to build a tower and tourist attraction in your city and the people reject its location. Company not feeling the love so Husky takes their tower to another city - Calgary.

Province looking to even up the score by investing in a project/amenity (I'm still not sure what), and it faces opposition from council member (and maybe more). Calgary council, which includes leftist politicians like Janz, votes unamiously for their arena deal which comes with provincial money.

Again, all these situations are unique with different circumstances, but on the surface someone might wonder what the hell?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top