News   Apr 03, 2020
 8.3K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.1K     0 

Neighbourhood Renewal

This section of 124 street is very well done, in my opinion. It has undergone a road diet and there is now much more room for boulevard trees and double-wide sidewalks. There was never a need for two driving lanes in each direction and the parking bays allow people to easily visit the small businesses along the strip. I'd give this above average marks.
 
Please fill out the Oliver Neighbourhood Renewal survey before this Friday!

This will be the largest and one of the most impactful renewals (# of residents and daily visitors) of all neighborhood renewals. These only come every 30-40 years!

 
Last edited:

There are 4 neighbourhood renewals budgeted per year. It sounds like Coun. Cartmell would like to see that reduced to 3 as a way of reducing property tax rate. When it comes to infrastructure though, pushing these projects out may just cost the city more in the long run. The city already has a huge infrastructure deficit.

Plus many of the renewals enhance neighbourhood safety.
 
There are 4 neighbourhood renewals budgeted per year. It sounds like Coun. Cartmell would like to see that reduced to 3 as a way of reducing property tax rate. When it comes to infrastructure though, pushing these projects out may just cost the city more in the long run. The city already has a huge infrastructure deficit.

Plus many of the renewals enhance neighbourhood safety.
There has been some big infrastructure spending in the last few years. I feel we are going to have to adjust the pace and catch our breath for financial and other reasons, so I don't think the Councilor's proposal is unreasonable.
 
It's honestly embarrassing how dire Edmonton's financial crisis is these days. The citizens of other cities like Calgary and Ottawa are losing it over the prospect of a 3-4% increase in their property taxes next year, meanwhile, there's us.
 
It's honestly embarrassing how dire Edmonton's financial crisis is these days. The citizens of other cities like Calgary and Ottawa are losing it over the prospect of a 3-4% increase in their property taxes next year, meanwhile, there's us.
“…meanwhile, there’s us” after decades of boasting about how “it’s cheaper here “.

This is the bill for being cheaper here.
 
There are 4 neighbourhood renewals budgeted per year. It sounds like Coun. Cartmell would like to see that reduced to 3 as a way of reducing property tax rate. When it comes to infrastructure though, pushing these projects out may just cost the city more in the long run. The city already has a huge infrastructure deficit.

Plus many of the renewals enhance neighbourhood safety.
Especially now that we're starting to get into some of the 1970s-era neighbourhoods which seem almost to disregard anyone but vehicles in their designs. Many of those sidewalks and roads are now 50+ years old and definitely showing it.
 

 
I see the traffic department has not learned from the disaster on 105 Ave. This is option 5 being considered on 100 Ave. Note the parking bays that are to the right of the one-way bike lane.
Screenshot 2024-11-28 at 13.06.14.png
 
I see the traffic department has not learned from the disaster on 105 Ave. This is option 5 being considered on 100 Ave. Note the parking bays that are to the right of the one-way bike lane.
View attachment 615666

Why don't they just continue the MUP that was started on 100 Ave east of the streetcar crossing?
Or does that make too much sense for them?
 
I see the traffic department has not learned from the disaster on 105 Ave. This is option 5 being considered on 100 Ave. Note the parking bays that are to the right of the one-way bike lane.
View attachment 615666

It's my least favorite option of the 5 presented, but I recognize a variety of options have to be provided that take into account different considerations including parking. Other options limit or eliminate parking altogether.
 

Back
Top