News   Apr 03, 2020
 9.7K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.7K     0 

Miscellaneous

Concur....that's what it was.....but doesn't that aerial suggest otherwise? Ie, underground services being put in.....
The site was hard surfaced and the settling pond was relocated/expanded so the services you see are to service the new settling pond. It is still and will a snow storage site for the foreseeable future. Several snow storage sites will be undergoing staged reconstruction in the coming years.
 
Love the olive-colored brick on this building in Highlands.
20250405_190207.jpg
20250405_190151.jpg
 
I was passing by the Derwas Court apartments for the first time in a while and was really taken by their beauty. Does anyone know what's going on with them? They've been fenced for at least several months—are they being restored?
(photo taken from a moving bus—apologies for the weird angle)

View attachment 631932
I was passing by this beauty once again, this time on foot, and I heard something like a running motor from one of the upper floors. Could it be undergoing renovation?
 
Some interesting infill happening in Woodcroft.

Looks like it will be three 4-unit rowhouses, all with secondary suites. 24 homes on a lot that used to be 2 SFH's 😮

Site has been vacant for 10+ years as well. With the Brentwood project getting started, there will soon be a lot more people in this area to make use of the new Coronation rec centre!


View attachment 631957

View attachment 631958


Edit: Their previous work looks to be high quality, this could turn out quite nice!

https://platinumlivinghomes.com/sold/
PXL_20250412_212645372 - Copy.jpg


Going up fast!
 
So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles

This shouldn't have been allowed. This should be a single building with underground parking. I know I sound like one of them NIMBYs, but this isn't smart infill at all. Is this really what some of you want to see more of?
 
Last edited:
So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles

This shouldn't have been allowed. This should be a single building with underground parking. I know I sound like one of them NIMBYs, but this isn't smart infill at all. Is this really what some of you want to see more of?
I’m not sure going back to parking requirements is the solution. But I do think on street parking needs to move to a permitted/paid system if so many new developments are going to essentially guarantee permanent street parking for multiple new residents. Ideally residents store their vehicles on their property if they have them, not mooching off free street parking.
 

Back
Top