itom987
Active Member
That is an interesting building going up. We need more variety.
So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles
I’m not sure going back to parking requirements is the solution. But I do think on street parking needs to move to a permitted/paid system if so many new developments are going to essentially guarantee permanent street parking for multiple new residents. Ideally residents store their vehicles on their property if they have them, not mooching off free street parking.So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles
This shouldn't have been allowed. This should be a single building with underground parking. I know I sound like one of them NIMBYs, but this isn't smart infill at all. Is this really what some of you want to see more of?
I think this is right, although it may be politically unpalatable. My outlook is that grown-ups should be able to figure out for themselves whether they need parking or not, and if they do, they should be able to pay for it rather than counting on always having free street parking.I’m not sure going back to parking requirements is the solution. But I do think on street parking needs to move to a permitted/paid system if so many new developments are going to essentially guarantee permanent street parking for multiple new residents. Ideally residents store their vehicles on their property if they have them, not mooching off free street parking.
I want to agree, but since when have Edmontonians ever shown the ability to be grown ups when it comes to parking expectations? This kind of development is only going to further entrench the existing expectation that the City subsidize street side car storage.I think this is right, although it may be politically unpalatable. My outlook is that grown-ups should be able to figure out for themselves whether they need parking or not, and if they do, they should be able to pay for it rather than counting on always having free street parking.
So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles
This shouldn't have been allowed. This should be a single building with underground parking. I know I sound like one of them NIMBYs, but this isn't smart infill at all. Is this really what some of you want to see more of?
I noticed a certificate of substantial completion for the Affordable Storage building today; it's dated March 27. I wasn't expecting to see that yet, given that there aren't any units visible on the fourth floor. Maybe that floor just has a different configuration.
Making a big impact.The Supportive Housing building on 154 st will be GEC Architecture,
Major Development Permit
External ID
520420585-002
Job Type
Major Development Permit
Description
To construct a Residential building (63 Dwellings of Supportive Housing).
Applicant
GEC ARCHITECTURE
Status
Tech Rev - More Info Requested
Permit Class
Date Created
July 19, 2024
Approval Date
Location
10111 - 154 STREET NW Plan 965AH Blk 22 Lots 1-5
Neighbourhood
CANORA




