News   Apr 03, 2020
 9.1K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.3K     0 

Miscellaneous

So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles

This shouldn't have been allowed. This should be a single building with underground parking. I know I sound like one of them NIMBYs, but this isn't smart infill at all. Is this really what some of you want to see more of?
 
Last edited:
So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles

This shouldn't have been allowed. This should be a single building with underground parking. I know I sound like one of them NIMBYs, but this isn't smart infill at all. Is this really what some of you want to see more of?
I’m not sure going back to parking requirements is the solution. But I do think on street parking needs to move to a permitted/paid system if so many new developments are going to essentially guarantee permanent street parking for multiple new residents. Ideally residents store their vehicles on their property if they have them, not mooching off free street parking.
 
Clareview Costco moving to Manning, maybe the clareview location becomes a business center?
1744651769910.png
 
About time - that parking lot was already too small when it opened in the early 90's. I remember working at that Earls and having NO WHERE to park every back when it opened.
 
I’m not sure going back to parking requirements is the solution. But I do think on street parking needs to move to a permitted/paid system if so many new developments are going to essentially guarantee permanent street parking for multiple new residents. Ideally residents store their vehicles on their property if they have them, not mooching off free street parking.
I think this is right, although it may be politically unpalatable. My outlook is that grown-ups should be able to figure out for themselves whether they need parking or not, and if they do, they should be able to pay for it rather than counting on always having free street parking.
 
I think this is right, although it may be politically unpalatable. My outlook is that grown-ups should be able to figure out for themselves whether they need parking or not, and if they do, they should be able to pay for it rather than counting on always having free street parking.
I want to agree, but since when have Edmontonians ever shown the ability to be grown ups when it comes to parking expectations? This kind of development is only going to further entrench the existing expectation that the City subsidize street side car storage.
 
So where are the occupants of these 24 units of housing going to park? Are they all going to be riding bikes everywhere? Some of these residents (probably at least 1/3) are going to have vehicles

This shouldn't have been allowed. This should be a single building with underground parking. I know I sound like one of them NIMBYs, but this isn't smart infill at all. Is this really what some of you want to see more of?

If parking is a concern, maybe it’s not the right option for these people and they should consider other properties.
 
From AI...
The Koermann Block in Edmonton was a significant building in the city's history, most famously known as the site of the Ukrainian Bookstore. It was built in 1911 by Gustav Koermann and featured commercial space and residences. The building was later the home of the Ukrainian Bookstore until it relocated in 1925. The Koermann Block has been preserved and incorporated into the design of the Artists' Quarters project, and a recreation of the Ukrainian Bookstore can be found at Fort Edmonton Park.
 
The Supportive Housing building on 154 st will be GEC Architecture,

Major Development Permit​

External ID
520420585-002
Job Type
Major Development Permit
Description
To construct a Residential building (63 Dwellings of Supportive Housing).
Applicant
GEC ARCHITECTURE
Status
Tech Rev - More Info Requested
Permit Class

Date Created
July 19, 2024
Approval Date

Location
10111 - 154 STREET NW Plan 965AH Blk 22 Lots 1-5
Neighbourhood
CANORA
Making a big impact.
IMG_1534.jpeg
IMG_1535.jpeg
 

Back
Top