thommyjo
Senior Member
This street scape needs love haha. Sheesh.Taken: October 13, 2023
View attachment 512777
This street scape needs love haha. Sheesh.Taken: October 13, 2023
View attachment 512777
Don't get me wrong, this has great potential, but at $388,888/unit if spread over the total project or a 19% subsidy is a little hard to swallow.
Are there market units as well?
I'm always skeptical of the value of grants for in "Near Market" rentals. Does a reduction of rent from $1,239 (current EDM average) to $981 really make enough of a difference for a "low-income young adult" to justify a $6.5M investment? If they are low income that's still pretty damn high. If it was 80% of the bottom of the market I would be way more supportive."Williams Hall Ltd. is proposing to rehabilitate the former YMCA Edmonton Downtown Centre at 10030 102A Avenue NW to create 90 new, near-market affordable rental units (90 bedrooms) for low-income young adults struggling to pay market rent. Williams Hall Ltd. will work with Youth Agency Collaboration and Boyle Street Community Services who will refer eligible tenants to the units. The units will be offered at a maximum of 80 per cent of average market rents. This project would be the first affordable housing project located in the downtown neighbourhood to receive grant funding through this grant program.
The estimated construction budget for the entire rehabilitation project is approximately $35 million. The applicant has applied for $6,500,000 from the City to offset capital costs for the 90 units. In exchange for the City’s contribution, Williams Hall Ltd. would provide 20 years of affordable housing use. The applicant is also pursuing funding from CMHC’s National Housing Co-Investment Fund and the Government of Alberta's Affordable Housing Partnership Program."
I imagine low income covers a range. Minimum wage: you could make ends meet at this rental rate, but not by much: https://www.ecfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/Final-C-Primer-on-Income.pdf. That is also based on 2019 data, so include inflation, and the entertainment budget goes out the window. However, if you're slightly above minimum wage, you could make ends meet. Some projects will need subsidies, while others will need total costs covered. Other types of subsidised housing cover other levels of income though.I'm always skeptical of the value of grants for in "Near Market" rentals. Does a reduction of rent from $1,239 (current EDM average) to $981 really make enough of a difference for a "low-income young adult" to justify a $6.5M investment? If they are low income that's still pretty damn high. If it was 80% of the bottom of the market I would be way more supportive.
I know Cvidia has been building a bunch of "Near Market" rentals, but as a way to subsidize their income tested units while still supporting their mandate. Not so much as a housing solution directly.
IThis seems like an odd location for subsidized rentals when there are unlimited cheap walk ups across the city and vacant land to build new ones, and this location would be prime for some fresh lofts.
Lots of students in Downtown and adjacent areas, plus the LRT and general transit access as noted by @Tropical.This seems like an odd location for subsidized rentals when there are unlimited cheap walk ups across the city and vacant land to build new ones, and this location would be prime for some fresh lofts.
The subsidy is $72,000 per unit. However, the net cost per unit after the subsidy is still over $300,000. So, I'm not sure how that qualifies as affordable.Isn't it $72k per unit (90 units)?
Example - $1400/month unit at 80% without inflation is $67200 over 20 years.