David A
Senior Member
It does make sense. However, the Sandman seems to have a bit too much of a bunker like mentality now that makes it less attractive, I hope that will change/improve.
Williams Hall | ?m | 7s | Beljan Development | Hodgson Schilf Evans
- Thread starter Daveography
- Start date
Greenspace
Senior Member
| Reference Id: | Job No 498277812-005 |
| Description: | To establish a Comprehensive Sign Design Plan for (Williams Hall) |
| Variances and/or Discretionary Uses: | 1) Part 6, 6.90.6.6.: The maximum Sign Area for Sign C1 is 99.9.m2 instead of 20.0m2 |
| 2) Part 6, 6.90.6.5.2: To allow Fascia Signs C1 and B1 to be located above the second storey on a building greater than 2 stories. | |
| 3) Part 6, 6.90.6.23.1.2: To allow Projecting Signs A1 to A6 to be located above the floor of the second storey. | |
| 4) Part 6, 6.90.3.4.1: To allow signs B2 and B3 to have a clearance height of 1.7m instead of 2.5m above the path of travel intended for pedestrians. | |
| 10030 - 102A AVENUE NW | |
| Plan F Lots 77-78 | |
| Status: | Notification Appeal Period: October 22 - November 12, 2023 |
| Neighbourhood: | DOWNTOWN |
| Issue Date: | 2024/10/17 |
| Class Of Permit: | Discretionary Development |
| Notification Start Date: | 2024/10/22 |
| Notification End Date: | 2024/11/12 |
Development permit questions: Brenda Noorman (brenda.noorman@edmonton.ca)
Gronk!
Senior Member
Williams Hall has been silent all year. I've been using the pedway between ECC and Sandman about 4 times a month.
kcantor
Senior Member
Perhaps… but I’m pretty sure that the location of the tower’s elevators and stairwells and exiting etc. pretty much limit them to doing f*ck all even if that’s not their first choice.