Avenuer
Senior Member
Weird to propose this much density outside of the Downtown of a city as small as St. Albert...
I have to agree. No that I'm against the extra density — far from it, St. Albert is sprawly enough as it is and could really use more projects like this — but I can't help but feel a focus on downtown densification, even in the form of like six to eight story buildings would be a better approach. For a city that has nearly 70,000 citizens, it has a core that feels more small-town Albertan than a place like Camrose. I mean, obviously with this project they're building here cause that's the land they own, etc., but still.Weird to propose this much density outside of the Downtown of a city as small as St. Albert...
8.1 BL-20-026
Bylaws 11/2020, 12/2020 and 13/2020 Oakmont Area
Structure Plan, Land Use Bylaw Amendments (1st
Reading)
Presented by: Suzanne Bennett, Planner, Planning &
Development
The following motions were approved on Consent Agenda:
That Bylaw 11/2020, being amendment 4 to the Oakmont
Area Structure Plan 12/97, re-designating the subject lands
from Commercial and Low Density Residential to Mixed
Use, be read a first time.
That Bylaw 12/2020, being amendment 176 to the Land
Use Bylaw 9/2005, to redistrict the subject property from
Direct Control to Direct Control Mixed Use, be read a first
time.
That Bylaw 13/2020, being amendment 177 to the Land
Use Bylaw 9/2005, to enact textual changes to the Direct
Control Mixed Use District, and amendments to Schedule F
‘Building heights for Redevelopment’ be read a first time.
That a Public Hearing for Bylaw 11/2020, Bylaw 12/2020,
and Bylaw 13/2020 be scheduled for June 22, 2020 at 9:00
am MDT.