ChazYEG
Senior Member
T
And before you accuse me of ageism (which you always do whenever people point out that age IS a factor for many things, regardless of whether it being a positive or negative factor), I also agree that Sheryl has a much more interesting and robust setlist, and would much rather go to her concert than Pink's.
But sadly, her marketability is not as good as Pink's, nowadays.
it might be the case, but their target audience is significantly different, and Pink is a more widely recognized by younger generations than Sheryl, and these younger generation (mostly millennials and gen z) statistically have been accounting for the bulk of the concertgoers in venues like this."generational" -- how so? they both reached initial success within 6 years of each other. Sheryl Crow has a much deeper song catalogue of major hits -- it just seems odd that the billing is the wrong way around -- co-headliners I could understand.
And before you accuse me of ageism (which you always do whenever people point out that age IS a factor for many things, regardless of whether it being a positive or negative factor), I also agree that Sheryl has a much more interesting and robust setlist, and would much rather go to her concert than Pink's.
But sadly, her marketability is not as good as Pink's, nowadays.