News   Apr 03, 2020
 7.3K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 7.6K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 2.6K     0 

Downtown

Way to go. Bra F O.

You invest millions into BIAs, local business investments, Main Street renewal and KNOW that the #1 reason folks don't patron areas is due to paid parking (their own surveys) and now make it even less enticing to go support these areas and push the 'mall/power centre' value prop even hight.

WOW
---

All ePark zones in the city would now operate from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Most zones, except those around Rogers Place, only operate from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. currently.

The city will also start charging for parking on Sundays between the hours of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.
 
So dollars raised will be reinvested I am told, a good thing in theory, but again, the number one reason folks don't go to these areas is the paid/cost of parking (rightly or wrongly)

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.edmonton.ca/sites/default/files/public-files/Curbside-Management-Strategy.pdf?cb=1671152307
 
FkJbA8daEAAUidw

 
Just to clarify, Council approved to severely detract from downtown’s ability to attract people here after hours and on Sundays for…. 0.05% of the revenue for their yearly budget?

Definitely an interesting strategy for a City that has spent hundreds of millions over the past few decades to do the exact opposite.
 
Idk man it’s been a year and this council has been dodgy with some of the choices they’ve made. Their decisions kinda contradict each other sometimes. Like they funded 100 Km of bike infrastructure to build a viable connection with bike lanes but then also canceled the pedestrian bridge that serves as a main connection for bikes to get around.
 
Idk man it’s been a year and this council has been dodgy with some of the choices they’ve made. Their decisions kinda contradict each other sometimes. Like they funded 100 Km of bike infrastructure to build a viable connection with bike lanes but then also canceled the pedestrian bridge that serves as a main connection for bikes to get around.

I disagree using that specific decision you outlined to make your point. Most members of council made it pretty clear this was a tough decision and that the bridge is something that will be revisited and maybe some money from other levels of government will materialize.
But in terms of what has the most potential right now to reduce some of our car traffic, meet climate goals, have an impact on public health - it's definitely investing in completing the bike network and getting as much track as we can throughout the city.
 

But in terms of what has the most potential right now to reduce some of our car traffic, meet climate goals, have an impact on public health - it's definitely investing in completing the bike network and getting as much track as we can throughout the city.
source data please?
 
5BF0557F-DC6D-4E05-B444-D7E246E7612B.jpeg

New bus depot - 10180 105 St.

 
source data please?
Ok, sure - the Oilers are losing right now anyway.
When Mayor Sohi asked city administration during budget talks if the city can meet its climate goals without building out the bike plan, the answer was no. It is essential and it needs to happen asap, he was told. So will building a complete bike network help with that, according to data/research the city has? Yes!
Research cited by former chief planner of Vancouver Brent Toderian and by many other urbanists and engineers like former NYC chief transportation planner Sam Schwartz in his book, Street Smart, highlight that the most important factor in creating a viable, active alternative to driving is a well connected, efficient bike network that is protected. That is what research shows (it also saves lives) and it is the most important metric above others including weather and hills in terms of utilization of that network.
Dr. Karen Lee, UofA school of public health and former health advisor in NYC, outlines in her book Fit Cities that how cities are designed has a measurable impact on the health of the population. It there are viable, active alternatives to driving, especially for the millions of car trips in Edmonton per month that are 1-5km in distance, people can more easily accumulate the 30 minutes of moderate intensity activity required 5 days a week to reduce risks for costly chronic health conditions like diabetes and heart disease. In doing do, that helps remove some car trips and therefore helps reduces GHG emissions.

@kcantor do you think that bridge will have the same impact as a more complete bike network based on those three reasons I noted: reducing some car traffic, meeting city climate targets and increasing public health?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top