roe_
Active Member
I agree. I don't think paving will make parking lots last longer -- in fact, it seems to me that it will do exactly the opposite. In addition to being a time limited permit, the added requirements will make the return on investment for the owner worse over time. Rather than a gravel lot with little if any maintenance or services, owners would be required to pave, light and maintain lots going forward, which would reduce their return on their investment going forward.That's the rational whenever I've pushed one of the councilors about it. Honestly, I think its bullsh*t. Digging up a paved lot is not going to be the breaking point to stop a development.
If you are looking at it from a purely profit motive, it will make owners look more closely at how their capital is deployed and whether there are better (and more profitable) uses of a property than parking. Some might sit on a property with little to no profit, but other will come to a point where it is less costly to develop the property than continue to meet the new permitting requirements.