|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reference Id: | Job No 498277812-005 |
| Description: | To establish a Comprehensive Sign Design Plan for (Williams Hall) |
| Variances and/or Discretionary Uses: | 1) Part 6, 6.90.6.6.: The maximum Sign Area for Sign C1 is 99.9.m2 instead of 20.0m2 |
| 2) Part 6, 6.90.6.5.2: To allow Fascia Signs C1 and B1 to be located above the second storey on a building greater than 2 stories. | |
| 3) Part 6, 6.90.6.23.1.2: To allow Projecting Signs A1 to A6 to be located above the floor of the second storey. | |
| 4) Part 6, 6.90.3.4.1: To allow signs B2 and B3 to have a clearance height of 1.7m instead of 2.5m above the path of travel intended for pedestrians. | |
| 10030 - 102A AVENUE NW | |
| Plan F Lots 77-78 | |
| Status: | Notification Appeal Period: October 22 - November 12, 2023 |
| Neighbourhood: | DOWNTOWN |
| Issue Date: | 2024/10/17 |
| Class Of Permit: | Discretionary Development |
| Notification Start Date: | 2024/10/22 |
| Notification End Date: | 2024/11/12 |
Perhaps… but I’m pretty sure that the location of the tower’s elevators and stairwells and exiting etc. pretty much limit them to doing f*ck all even if that’s not their first choice.They will do f*ck all.
A bit more glazing and some new doors at grade and perhaps some painted brick but that's it I believe.Reminder, are they planning on doing work on the exterior too?
The current exterior is not inviting or attractive. If they cheap out on that they can kiss goodbye getting many people to come in to visit whatever they are planning to put in there.So gone are the original proposed exterior facade? That would be so unfortunate.
