_urbanite
Senior Member
I can hardly wait for the disappointment...
Time to unzip
regencyShould have been unzipped back in April. What the hell is taking these guys so long?
To my understanding, the envelope is stucco so it does rain during summertime constructions. If you leave wet stucco exposed to more wet/moist conditions, where does that moisture seep to?I have limited knowledge about this, but it seems very odd. It seems to me the covering is normally used in colder months to provide protection and allow temperature sensitive work to continue.
So, I would have expected to see it come off when it warmed up or that work was done. Maybe I am wrong, but it seems to be a bad sign to me that work has ground to a halt here
Yes, but wouldn't the stucco eventually dry and this not be a problem? So then the covering would be removed. If this is the case it sounds like the stucco work that probably should have been done 6 months ago or more is progressing slowly or not at all.To my understanding, the envelope is stucco so it does rain during summertime constructions. If you leave wet stucco exposed to more wet/moist conditions, where does that moisture seep to?
I'm skeptical of that comment from the scaffolder. Extending the construction length of a building is more expensive for an owner in many ways beyond just construction itselfWell if I go by the comments of one of the scaffolders that worked on the project, it has more to do with the owner cheaping out and taking as long as it takes, and then some.
Didn't wanna post a photo because there's others who have more 'ownership' of posting for this project (and have better cameras for it lol), but the tarps on the East side of the building are coming off. about /12 the tower was exposed on that side as of Saturday evening.
I passed earlier this week and I can confirm that yes they did. The colour pallet isn't quite as bad as the renders because they're a little more muted, but it's still just a stucco box that will age poorly.Did the exposed part you saw make you cry?
I get ya, basically though the statement made sense. If the owner had a choice of getting a bunch of scaffolders and get it all down in a week's time, or hire only a couple scaffolders and get it down much slower and possibly save a few bucks, the owner would prefer option 2.I'm skeptical of that comment from the scaffolder. Extending the construction length of a building is more expensive for an owner in many ways beyond just construction itself