East Junction | 86m | 25s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates

[_urbanite]

This is just FUGLY

From Edgewater 1 & 2 (acceptable), to The Pearl, to 121 West, and now this?

 

[CplKlinger]

Those tiny windows! Reminds me of a prison.

 

[northlands]

This is just FUGLY

From Edgewater 1 & 2 (acceptable), to The Pearl, to 121 West, and now this?

I actually like Edgewater 1& 2, they're of the aesthetically better towers in the world of stucco & punched windows. And 121 West is at least neatly tucked away off main streets.

Meanwhile, this tower looks like it's from an alternate timeline where glass is a rare earth mineral.

 

[northlands]

FYI - this is the rendering Regency provided for this tower.

 

[EtoV]

New and improved, now with 80% less window, 100% less glazing, and 50% percent more stucco!

 

[Guy 1]

My expectations were so low, and yet somehow this didn't even come close to meeting them.

 

[Dubas]

Every suite would have so little natural light…. No thanks

 

[BrettB]

well, um... at least it's energy efficient?

 

[Kosy123]

They really skimped out on the windows lol

I'm really surprised this is the same company that did the Pearl

 

[strata]

This is a building.

 

[EdmTrekker]

What was delivered is terrible compared to the rendering submitted to the City. Thankfully the City did not agree for any expansion given this atrocity. I don't think many people will want to live in 1960 style of design with little natural light and tiny balcony unless these suites are rented well below market.

 

[Gronk!]

New and improved, now with 80% less window, 100% less glazing, and 50% percent more stucco!

Value engineering at its best!

 

[thommyjo]

The bar is so low and yet they chose to limbo…

 

[EtoV]

Value engineering at its best!

What's it called when you value engineer a building that was already value engineered?

 

[Canadian 001]

Value-Value Enginerring