News   Apr 03, 2020
 8.3K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.1K     0 

Municipal Politics


 
CSU 52 basically got what they wanted, which Corbold forewarned Council would add an additional 2.5% to 2024 and 2% to 2025. What was just released was 2.1%, so it's mostly related to CSU 52 agreement. Media reported on this during the negotiations so I'm not sure why these two articles didn't mention that.
 
CSU 52 basically got what they wanted, which Corbold forewarned Council would add an additional 2.5% to 2024 and 2% to 2025. What was just released was 2.1%, so it's mostly related to CSU 52 agreement. Media reported on this during the negotiations so I'm not sure why these two articles didn't mention that.

Narrative council is pushing, or at least a few, is there wouldnt be a tax increase if province didnt shortchange city on at least a half dozen different spending items.
 
Narrative council is pushing, or at least a few, is there wouldnt be a tax increase if province didnt shortchange city on at least a half dozen different spending items.
It could prove to be popular. This coming in on the heels of the municipal parties, provincial gatekeeping of municipal funds and general Danielle Smith antics could deflect popular anger in that direction, if they hammer that point home.
 
Sooo…

It now looks like our property taxes in Edmonton will go up 8.7% this year, 7% next year and 6 7% the year after.

23.75% in 3 years!

Imagine the uproar if income taxes or sales taxes or carbon taxes were to escalate at that pace…
 
Narrative council is pushing, or at least a few, is there wouldnt be a tax increase if province didnt shortchange city on at least a half dozen different spending items.
It's hard to say if this will be successful or not. Province doesn't have to do anything it doesn't want to unfortunately. Not saying it's fair but you have to work within the framework you've got. Andre was telling them in 2022 you needed to factor in wages going up, Council told him to take it out.

So they knew this was coming and now they are finding politically expedient ways to shift the blame. Maybe that's just politics, but taxpayers aren't gonna really know why they're paying this much.
 
Last edited:
It's hard to say if this will be successful or not. Province doesn't have to do anything it doesn't want to unfortunately. Not saying it's fair but you have to work within the framework you've got. Andre was telling them in 2022 you needed to factor in wages going up, Council told him to take it out.

So they knew this was coming and now they are finding politically expedient ways to shift the blame. Maybe that's just politics, but taxpayers aren't gonna really know why they're paying this much.
Voters are going to hold the City of Edmonton accountable for increases on bills that prominently say City of Edmonton on them. Surely even politicians can understand that.

I also agree there was some kicking the can down the road related to wage increases. They knew this was coming, it should not have been a surprise to any competent management.
 
A significant amount of Calgary's surplus is from electricity fees, something almost $200 million. I don't think it's a fair comparison to make tbh


"Thanks to Calgary's formula, relying on the variable default electricity rate. This led to the City of Calgary collecting $303 million in revenue from local access fees, which is a surplus of $186 million more in these fees being collected by the city than they budgeted," said Nathan Neudorf, minister of affordability and utilities.

$270 in access fees in Calgary compared to $75 in Edmonton for 2023 is stupid insane.
 

Back
Top