Jesus, that looks like already dated buildings from the nineties. Nice turrets or whatever those are...Some pics. Good density. Brutal designs.
Random commercial across 122st on the corner. View attachment 714662View attachment 714663View attachment 714664View attachment 714665View attachment 714666View attachment 714668
So what? Just because they are on "University" lands - U of A is, have no idea about the YYC version - what does that have to do with the price of tea in China? Now my retort to you will be, "look what we're building on the Griesbach lands, or look what we're building in Chapelle Gardens." Comparing random developments occurring in both cities to each other - makes no sense.....
Tacky rooflines are one of the more common ways that apartment buildings (and heck, SFHs too) go terribly wrong here.Jesus, that looks like already dated buildings from the nineties. Nice turrets or whatever those are...
Same here - it's all one big blur which makes it difficult to notice the weird design choices with the apartments.I love the way this development is visible from the freeway.
Its more you see some dense urbanism like what you see when yer on the DVP.Same here - it's all one big blur which makes it difficult to notice the weird design choices with the apartments.
I think it makes perfect sense to compare two developments being built on University lands, in similarly aged neighbourhoods. This is hardly comparing random developments. Calgary's blows Edmonton's out of the water.So what? Just because they are on "University" lands - U of A is, have no idea about the YYC version - what does that have to do with the price of tea in China? Now my retort to you will be, "look what we're building on the Griesbach lands, or look what we're building in Chapelle Gardens." Comparing random developments occurring in both cities to each other - makes no sense.....
I agree with ya, I just saw the chance for a joke and wanted to take itIts more you see some dense urbanism like what you see when yer on the DVP.
Well a very important difference is Calgary's development is near the main campus area, whereas the area here is very far from the main campus.I think it makes perfect sense to compare two developments being built on University lands, in similarly aged neighbourhoods. This is hardly comparing random developments. Calgary's blows Edmonton's out of the water.
Fair enough its main campus for Calgary vs south campus for Edmonton. But both developments are in similarly aged neighbourhoods, similarly distanced from the cores of each city. I dont think its too much to ask for better quality in Edmonton for a large development like this, and it may end within walking distance of a hospital + additional transit options in 10 years time. Just a big missed opportunity IMO.Well a very important difference is Calgary's development is near the main campus area, whereas the area here is very far from the main campus.
However I do agree the U of A, which struggles to maintain its main campus and seems to neglect Enterprise Square, should also try do better here.




