thommyjo
Senior Member
Too basic. Needs to be a statement bridge for the next century.
Vancouver has a few that come to mind with the sort of height and span we would need.
Too basic. Needs to be a statement bridge for the next century.
I definitely agree that it should be a statement bridge, but absolutely not a suspension/cable-stayed bridge. The existing HLB deck is 48m high, and you still have to descend from the top if the valley on either side to reach it. Assuming we build the new bridge fully level with the top of either riverbank, it would be even higher and the bridge towers would be ridiculously tall. Underside arches are the way to go imo.Too basic. Needs to be a statement bridge for the next century.
Vancouver has a few that come to mind with the sort of height and span we would need. View attachment 712829
Ooohhh..... like the Maria Pia? I think it gives the best nod towards the original bridge. I'm not nearly as fond of the newer Infante Dom Henrique bridge... too minimalist.Something like the bridge in Porto, Portugal would be awesome.
I just skimmed over this, but it is actually fascinating. The math on it is wildly interesting, tooArch bridges and how to build them (including some great images):
It's a very large file so give it time to download. It's worth the wait.
From elsewhere, there's the Walterdale Bridge writ large:
View attachment 712890




