IanO Superstar Member Bio Joined Sep 23, 2015 Messages 10,768 Reaction score 32,812 Yesterday at 7:23 PM #586 Either way and given the priority and expansion not good.
H Habibfazil Active Member Member Bio Joined Nov 13, 2022 Messages 278 Reaction score 345 Yesterday at 9:28 PM #587 thommyjo said: More low income/seniors/subsidized users? More youth and students? More fare evasion? Less full cost monthly passes? And now ARC likely shifting some monthly users to $60-80/month vs $100? Or other causes as well? Click to expand... why don't they mention the scared off real and potential riders who will not take the risk. All on the city, the bylaws are there, blame the city. Overstating the fare evasion is a neat trick, WHAT is the real number???
thommyjo said: More low income/seniors/subsidized users? More youth and students? More fare evasion? Less full cost monthly passes? And now ARC likely shifting some monthly users to $60-80/month vs $100? Or other causes as well? Click to expand... why don't they mention the scared off real and potential riders who will not take the risk. All on the city, the bylaws are there, blame the city. Overstating the fare evasion is a neat trick, WHAT is the real number???
YEG Bus Rider New Member Member Bio Joined Nov 11, 2023 Messages 95 Reaction score 186 Location [907 Terra Losa] Yesterday at 9:30 PM #588 This is the End of the Line ETS was involved with this report about funding. Edmonton: Page 88-90