Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates

[Gronk!]

We need a derelict property bylaw - oh wait...

 

[dkazzed]

I used to think that, but honestly, faux for faux sake is not the right way to go in my opinion. I'd rather see a modern interpretation to be honest.

I think Edgar did a good job with MacLaren. Would that be classified as faux or modern interpretation?

 

[Gronk!]

Send Regency an email demanding an explanation for this so-called "project"
Email address: Info@regencydevelopments.ca

 

[IanO]

I think Edgar did a good job with MacLaren. Would that be classified as faux or modern interpretation?

Modern.

 

[JuliallThat]

We should just start building our own tower there, they probably wouldn't even notice.
If you have any extra building materials feel free to unload it on the site, we'll get to it when the pile gets big enough.

 

[thommyjo]

That would be great. However, I'd bet once Regency moves on this in 10 years time, we'll get something closer to this:
View attachment 625785

This is best case scenario based on recent projects…

 

[mcr]

This is best case scenario based on recent projects…

View attachment 625914View attachment 625915

Hell, if they insist on being the ones to develop the site in the end, just put a carbon copy of The Pearl there (roughly the same lot size). Would be better than any of their recent offerings.

 

[Tropical]

Hell, if they insist on being the ones to develop the site in the end, just put a carbon copy of The Pearl there (roughly the same lot size). Would be better than any of their recent offerings.

I'm surprised that kind of thing doesn't happen more often to be honest