Avenuer
Senior Member
Is it a better proposal?
Horne and Pitfield Building Redevelopment | ?m | ?s | Limak Investments
- Thread starter Avenuer
- Start date
Greenspace
Senior Member
^Haven't seen it yet.
cmd uw
Active Member
Should be interesting to see how this new Council deals with this.
Rezoning going to public hearing on April 20.
Administration Report
Administration Report
CaptainBL
Active Member
Rezoning going to public hearing on April 20.
Oooooo wow coming back with a proposal that saves two facades instead of one facade for one of the last remaining, impressive and historically-significant warehouse structures in downtown. We just arent worthy of your contributions, Limak.
Avenuer
Senior Member
And Limak isn't even a reputable developer, so even if the rezoning is approved there isn't a great chance they will even build what is proposed...
CaptainBL
Active Member
Their website alone is a complete joke. The front page has some blurry rendering pictures of the Ice District and the words "Real Estate Development" as if to imply they have something to do with the Ice District.
IanO
Senior Member
This is simply V2.0 of the other project on the Blue Plate and adjacent site. SO many similarities and we know how that one ended.
Greenspace
Senior Member
^I have similar concerns. Also the current building is in great shape, it would have been better to have a more creative proposal that keeps the building and integrates it in to a slim tower located on the parking lot.
Changes to the application, 1) West and south façade saved, will be designated historic before construction, 2) 103 Avenue sidewalk widened significantly. Transportation has agreed to reduce the street there by a lane.
Changes to the application, 1) West and south façade saved, will be designated historic before construction, 2) 103 Avenue sidewalk widened significantly. Transportation has agreed to reduce the street there by a lane.
David A
Senior Member
How about an even better change - keep the historic building and put a new tower on one of the several empty or under utilized lots nearby.
It is even worse this is being put forth by a developer with not much of a track record. I have doubts what is proposed will proceed, so do not tear down what is there.
We really don't need another empty lot downtown and it would really detract from what is becoming a nicer area.
It is even worse this is being put forth by a developer with not much of a track record. I have doubts what is proposed will proceed, so do not tear down what is there.
We really don't need another empty lot downtown and it would really detract from what is becoming a nicer area.
Greenspace
Senior Member
^Good feedback to provide to the City or at the public hearing.
Canadian 001
Active Member
Also, When a project goes under the lot sometimes never goes for sale and sits for Several Years
Examples:
Arlington Apartments
The Mezzo (Recently cancelled)
The Artisan (Knox Church)
The Edmontonian
The Mackenzie tower
The Emerald
Potentially Dead Projects:
Edmonton Motors Phase I
J123
The Village 121
Brewery District North
Hollyrood Tower II
Southpark on Whyte Phase II, III and IV
Strathern Hights Phase I
Examples:
Arlington Apartments
The Mezzo (Recently cancelled)
The Artisan (Knox Church)
The Edmontonian
The Mackenzie tower
The Emerald
Potentially Dead Projects:
Edmonton Motors Phase I
J123
The Village 121
Brewery District North
Hollyrood Tower II
Southpark on Whyte Phase II, III and IV
Strathern Hights Phase I
God
Active Member
The Mackenzie makes my heart ache
Platinum107
Senior Member
God
Active Member
Please don’t make me feel guilty I just had a poutine 15 minutes ago.