IanO
Superstar
I'm a little surprised (or maybe not) that we have not had more data shared.
Should I shoot opendata@edmonton.ca an email? I presume the counter is malfunctioning but I also haven't been to MacKinnon ravine park.Wow, it looks like a lot of people took up cycling once that cold snap ended in January.
View attachment 383047
This can’t be right haha. I wish it was. But something must be off. I cycle here a lot and I think that jump would be noticeable, but it hasn’t seemed very different.Wow, it looks like a lot of people took up cycling once that cold snap ended in January.
View attachment 383047
I was split between Option 2 (protected lanes on both sides) and option 3 (1 protected lane and traffic calmed street with right turn diverters and curb extensions). I figured the 2 lanes would be the safest pick though.Victoria promenade survey: please give feedback!
same. option 2 seemed like the least bad solution. I just wish they'd put a proper bi-directional, 3m-wide lane on the South side. that would put the pedestrian and bike space next to each other, give bikes space to maneuver (read: pass, which the mono-directional lanes in option 2 are too narrow for) and act as traffic calming for cars. the mono-directional lanes tend to put you too close for comfort to traffic, but none of the options seem to consider that. IDK, all 4 options seem overly-complicated and convoluted, and really geared around managing car traffic via the addition of bike infra instead of genuinely trying to improve biking.I was split between Option 2 (protected lanes on both sides) and option 3 (1 protected lane and traffic calmed street with right turn diverters and curb extensions). I figured the 2 lanes would be the safest pick though.