Canada and Monarchy

[HappyJazzz]

^I think it started with a Trumper trumpeting nonsense counter to the Monarchy discussion... a Fox news aficionado no doubt.

Let me guess, you still view the world through the left/right false dichotomy too?

It's one thing if it was an "angry neighbor"; unfortunately this neighbor is just plain dumb!

Beware your arrogance. From what I've gathered from your posts, you're closer to the end of your life than the start. Those sorts of attitudes will keep you trapped in samsara

 

[HappyJazzz]

I dunno, there is a certain poetic rhythm to using a thread on Canada and the Monarchy for someone to express their Quisling fantasy.

Maybe my glasses are broken, but seems pretty plain to me that the world order is being reoriented right now.

With the social control methods outlined in brave new world more or less complete, it's time for the geopolitical boundaries and forever wars of 1984.

But no one said Oceania couldn't have a monarch!

 

[archited]

^you surmise this and you surmise that -- stuck in some sort of fever dream where your world view is quite solidly cemented. You've attached yourself to a confirmed idiot like a barnacle to a ship's hull - enjoy the cruise!

 

[HappyJazzz]

Thanks! You have no idea how much I'm looking forward to Pacific Theatre 2

 

[archited]

You are one of those who enjoy reading their own posts -- one of those closeted-viewpoint-meisters who really learn nothing (talk about end-of-life syndrome) because they think they already know it all. The sad part is that you think you can foist your viewpoint on others and with a misguided and misappropriated turn-of-phrase believe that you are really sounding intelligent -- wrong!

 

[Whattagame]

In any case, if you seriously believe Canada doesn't have a fent problem, go take your kids for a walk through Chinatown tonight..

Speaking of China, this is a very eye opening read for anyone who is genuinely interested in learning more about the root of these problems.

That's moving the goalposts, though. The issue is movement of the drug accross the border from Canada to the US. There's no argument from me that it's a problem within our borders.

 

[David A]

That's moving the goalposts, though. The issue is movement of the drug accross the border from Canada to the US. There's no argument from me that it's a problem within our borders.

... and some of the problem probably comes across the border from the US to us. I

 

[Whattagame]

... and some of the problem probably comes across the border from the US to us. I

Absolutely. There was a major bust at the Alberta border a couple of weeks ago, but the drugs weren't going in the same direction that Trump would have you believe.

 

[TAS]

Absolutely. There was a major bust at the Alberta border a couple of weeks ago, but the drugs weren't going in the same direction that Trump would have you believe.

Yup and then there's this example as well - which supports the drug cartels in Mexico.

"An estimated 200,000 to half million U.S. firearms are smuggled into Mexico every year."

Mexico fights to dam "iron river" sending guns from U.S. to cartels

While many in the U.S. have lambasted the flow of migrants and drugs from Mexico, the porous border works both ways. Mexico's government says guns from the U.S. are fueling cartel violence.

www.google.com