News   Apr 03, 2020
 9.1K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.3K     0 

O-day’min Park (formerly Warehouse Park)

I thought the original vision was for a downtown nature park. Not a theme park. O-Day'min is a bunch of different activity ideas that were thrown together and placed in a series of disjointed silos. There's no continuity to the park. No soul. Better than parking lots but that's not a high bar. I'm sorry but they should have named the place Stanley Milner Park. Looks like the work of the same firm.
Have you ever commented something that isn't negative on this on this forum? Surely if you are saying there's no soul you would have at least been there to visit for the grand opening to speak with such authority?
 
IMG_9993.jpeg

IMG_9995.jpeg
IMG_9998.jpeg
IMG_0011.jpeg
IMG_9988.jpeg
IMG_0022.jpeg
IMG_9990.jpeg
 
Have you ever commented something that isn't negative on this on this forum? Surely if you are saying there's no soul you would have at least been there to visit for the grand opening to speak with such authority?
That's not an accurate judgement of my comments. The Jasper Avenue redo is very good. The CN Tower is iconic. Walterdale Bridge is brilliant. Edmonton City Hall is among the nicest in Canada. And I've expressed that. As a matter of fact, Constance said the firepits look cool and I agree but would you place them right up front and make them a focal point of a downtown park? Let's get real. What kind of design is that?
 
The lighting feature is great, I really wish we had more colours or neon around downtown at night. Better lighting just makes for a safer environment at night.

We're definitely getting more than 1600 units built around the area, it's just a really nice space overall.
 
I thought the original vision was for a downtown nature park. Not a theme park. O-Day'min is a bunch of different activity ideas that were thrown together and placed in a series of disjointed silos. There's no continuity to the park. No soul. Better than parking lots but that's not a high bar. I'm sorry but they should have named the place Stanley Milner Park. Looks like the work of the same firm.
A downtown nature park? The river valley is the downtown nature park. It’s right there and it’s huge.

I think this park looks great and will be incredible once it’s surrounded by residential buildings.
 
A few reflections from visiting with kiddos today:

1) access is a bit tough currently. Hopefully we can quickly improve that next year with alleys, 106st, and 107st entrances improving? We need parks phase 2 to happen asap.

2) I was very wrong about the playground. It’s stunning and very fun. It could still be bigger, more diversity of age appropriate features, etc. but it’s a very fun playground and beyond beautiful.

3) pavilion is awesome. There’s a dedicated kids washing station. So cool. Also a dedicated change table room that’s not a bathroom. Hard to communicate if you don’t have babies how amazing that is. Feels much cleaner and safer that way.

4) trees being small definitely hurts the vibe a bit. Will be so much nicer in 10 years.

5) swings are lovely around the art feature.

IMG_4136.jpeg
IMG_4137.jpeg
IMG_4140.jpeg
IMG_4141.jpeg
IMG_4142.jpeg
IMG_4143.jpeg
IMG_4144.jpeg
IMG_4145.jpeg
IMG_4146.jpeg
IMG_4147.jpeg
IMG_4148.jpeg
IMG_4149.jpeg
IMG_4150.jpeg
IMG_4151.jpeg
IMG_4152.jpeg
 
3) pavilion is awesome. There’s a dedicated kids washing station. So cool. Also a dedicated change table room that’s not a bathroom. Hard to communicate if you don’t have babies how amazing that is. Feels much cleaner and safer that way.
Used that change table today, oh so incredibly appreciated! Really looking forward to taking kiddo there over the next few years.
 
A downtown nature park? The river valley is the downtown nature park. It’s right there and it’s huge.

I think this park looks great and will be incredible once it’s surrounded by residential buildings.
The absence of residential buildings isn't the issue. Over time they'll more than likely fill in if the price is right. It's the overall composition of the park that's lacking. It's segmented into a variety of compartments without them having good interaction or integration with the rest of the park. Might not have been as bad if the open area wasn't about as inviting as sitting in an open field in Saskatchewan. So many from the area will go from a small compartmentalized apartment living environment to a small compartmentalized park environment.
 

Back
Top