TAS
Senior Member
Rahim Jaffer is running a serious campaign and I would be willing to bet is gaining some momentum. Not saying he's winning, but he's going to get decent support.
If he's being tough on crime, I hope that includes drunk driving and cocaine possession.Rahim Jaffer is running a serious campaign and I would be willing to bet is gaining some momentum. Not saying he's winning, but he's going to get decent support.
View attachment 676779View attachment 676780View attachment 676781View attachment 676782
He don't do that anymore ... I hopeIf he's being tough on crime, I hope that includes drunk driving and cocaine possession.
If he's being tough on crime, I hope that includes drunk driving and cocaine possession.
I know, and I fully trust that he's sobered up, but I hope he has the humility to acknowledge that he only is where he is because a judge in Ontario was soft on him.He don't do that anymore ... I hope
So far we got:
Knack: progressive candidate with most of the Iveson-Sohi coalition
Walters: centrist-ish, possibly catering to the Mandel voters (or what's left of them)
Cartmell: ??? anti-infill
Jaffer: tough on crime classic conservative
Caterina: angry right wing man yells at cloud that has rainbows and infill.
Cartmell's voter base is being split here pretty badly.
I heard a theory that the UCP implemented municipal parties to boost the funding for preferred mayoral candidates, with the intention of enacting "strong mayor" powers if the elected leader is acting in the interests of the Premier. No idea if it's true.Take Caterina's name out of this. He is not even trying. Same as last election where he came 5th against all unknowns.
I think Cartmell has decent support of business community? Maybe just downtown business groups?
And maybe support of most UCP?
Seen a few around Aspen Gardens on Monday. Lavender coloured.Has anyone seen Michael Walters signs anywhere? I've only seen Knack and Cartmell around for any signage.
I can see Jaffer's message resonating with some people given the current situation and times even though it is bit incongruous given his past.So far we got:
Knack: progressive candidate with most of the Iveson-Sohi coalition
Walters: centrist-ish, possibly catering to the Mandel voters (or what's left of them)
Cartmell: ??? anti-infill
Jaffer: tough on crime classic conservative
Caterina: angry right wing man yells at cloud that has rainbows and infill.
Cartmell's voter base is being split here pretty badly.
Between Knack's name recognition and the cannibalization of the Cartmell vote, I think our baldest mayoral candidate has the best odds.I can see Jaffer's message resonating with some people given the current situation and times even though it is bit incongruous given his past.
One of Cartmell's problems is he is an incumbent, so its harder to run against what has been done all the years he was on council. It kind of gives the message he was ineffective.
I do feel voters are in an anti incumbent mood right now so that may not be good for either Knack or Cartmell.
Ron Billingsley, now infamously the guy who showed up drunk to the Edmonton Centre MP debate as an independent candidate, is running too.New candidate for mayor alert:
Paul Bakhmut
I always appreciate and tend to vote for folks with actual policy recommendations (although I have noticed it is usually a losing strategy). But I thought these begged a few key questions:Rahim Jaffer is running a serious campaign and I would be willing to bet is gaining some momentum. Not saying he's winning, but he's going to get decent support.




