fromyeg
Active Member
This post from Troy Pavlek made me laugh.
This is my wife and I. We live in a neighborhood 10-15 minutes from most downtown spots. I work 2 days in the office, sometimes 3 depending on what is needed. She is in five days a week. We drive together, I drop her off and then go pay for parking. On the days when I’m at home, I just drive her to work and usually pick her up. Cheaper to do this than us both having bus passes. I imagine many people that work hybrid are in this boat. We take the LRT to some events downtown if we have time, but driving is faster if we are in a crunch. The west LRT will be nice for some people, but the choice not to prioritize speed of that line will likely mean we choose to drive or even bike instead of take the train.come on man. Let your ideology have some nuance. Imagine running a business on 104st...
Its january, you live in Hazeldean. It's a 13min drive to Downtown...and you already own the car so most costs are sunk beyond a small gas expense. It's 35min for transit, which costs $7 and involves 7-10min walks on both the start and end of the trip in cold weather.
If parking is $5-10 downtown, you likely just hit up a spot on calgary trail/gateway or southgate for free parking. If it's free, you consider heading downtown still maybe.
Transit can't compete for most people, especially those with more buying power. Uni students, the elderly, and lower income transit users aren't keeping downtown restaurants and retail alive. The middle to upper class edmontontians and families with cars are still needed for most businesses to survive.
I believe that If Rachel Notley entered the mayoral race in Edmonton she would win hands down.
Worth noting from Troy's video is that in his past two terms, Knack missed zero votes (to my understanding).As he announced, Cartmell missed Tuesday's vote on infill due to planned vacation.
According to this, Cartmell has missed 59 meetings this term and as a result has missed votes on hundreds of items. Sometimes he was representing city at events like Stampede or at UCP talks. But, if accurate, that's a lot of missed meetings overall.
View attachment 665036
Yes, and not the least of which would be encouraging a "do-something" slate of councillors to run. The current group of Councillors needs to be fired en masse (color me bitter from the dumb-ass vote re the cross river aerial tram)..She would definitely boost profile of the city and bring a lot of strengths to the table.
Well at least our council is consistent - again no one comes out of this looking very good. Cartmell is just another bad apple in a bunch of bad apples.![]()
Keith Gerein: Frustrated Cartmell was his own worst enemy during council's hearing on Edmonton infill
Edmonton mayoral candidate Tim Cartmell pitched a partial infill ban that went nowhere, then missed a key city council vote on limiting impacts to neighbourhoodsedmontonjournal.com
"... while (Cartmell) and other councillors undoubtedly need a break, if I was running for mayor, I would probably find a way to participate remotely in an issue that is clearly of major importance to Edmontonians. It’s especially galling that after supporting a six-unit maximum, he wasn’t there to cast the vote that would have ensured that outcome."
Pretty big fail on Cartmell's part.
Well at least our council is consistent - again no one comes out of this looking very good. Cartmell is just another bad apple in a bunch of bad apples.
They are not all rotten, but no one really comes out of this looking good because of all the rotten apples. A reasonable proposal is made, it is defeated by those that bother to show up and complained about by a couple fo those that don't including one that swears at another councilor.No one? Not one councillor met your expectations on the infill debate? What what you have done differently that no other councillor did on this infill issue?




