The_Cat
Senior Member
I wonder if the next bridge will be build in the style of Walterdale or Tawatina, with no piers built in the river.
So everyone is concerned with a bridge across the river valley but what I'd like to know how is this train going to get to the river valley. We are assuming that this HSR train will be given access to the current ROW. Is that a given or will that have to be negotiated? If that ROW isn't available how and where does the route get into the city?
Direct from the throne speech:A mention in the throne speech of rail between Edmonton and Calgary. Will it be to move or to study AGAIN? https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmo...te-alberta-legislature-fall-sitting-1.7011354
It’ll probably be sent to a committee and then the committee will have the same findings as it did in 2014.A mention in the throne speech of rail between Edmonton and Calgary. Will it be to move or to study AGAIN? https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmo...te-alberta-legislature-fall-sitting-1.7011354
It’s the right approach then. High-speed rail will be quite successful with regional rail in Greater Edmonton and Calgary, on top of the successful LRT systems we have here.I think they will probably try to get the Downtown to Airport (and Banff) lines built initially with some commuter rail potential as part of that.
The throne speech hints at the planning of the Calgary Edmonton link which will probably include feasibility studies and land acquisitions based on those studies. To get to the high speed rail stage, some form of commuter rail will likely be needed to support that mode shift. It would be much more successful if there is "feed" on either end of the network.
Is it though? What about Wetaskiwin or Olds? The right approach is inter-city rail with HSR coming once demand is there.It’s the right approach then. High-speed rail will be quite successful with regional rail in Greater Edmonton and Calgary, on top of the successful LRT systems we have here.