Valley Line LRT/ Valley Line West | ?m | ?s | City of Edmonton

TAS said:
Yup, car/oil industry were pretty hostile to any other form of transportation, including walking.
Click to expand...
Well it was an era when oil was cheap and people did not initially appreciate the impact on the climate.

Personally I am a huge fan of walking - the cheapest way to travel, but you need to have a decent selection of goods and services nearby for that to work well.
 
The_Cat said:
GM puchased a lot of streetcar lines around 1951 and they were bulldozed. I think there would be some value restoring some of the old routes.
Click to expand...
TAS said:
Yup, car/oil industry were pretty hostile to any other form of transportation, including walking.
Click to expand...
In Edmonton, it was moreso because the city was too broke during the Great Depression to invest almost anything more than light maintenance - like replacing old rails and streetcars. In 1937, city admin recommended switching completely to trolley (and some gas) buses rather than trying to tackle what was then a huge infrastructure deficit, and a 1938 consultant report agreed. World War 2 paradoxically bought the streetcars some more time, since bus deliveries almost completely halted during the war, while also putting more strain on the system than it could handle. Foster Palmer, a Harvard librarian who shot colour footage of Edmonton's streetcar network, among others, in 1949/50, noted that Edmonton was actually a rare exception among North American cities:

"Edmonton provides an interesting contrast to cities which will not spend a penny on new street-car facilities after a decision for eventual abandonment has been made. The management here is trying very hard to provide good service in a rapidly growing community. Service on Route 1 is excellent in frequency (3 to 5 minutes), but rather slow. The Calder line has ten minute service during most of the day, which is very good considering its outlying location. All trolley fans who can still possibly do so should visit Edmonton while the cars still run. The High Level Bridge is one of the true “greats” in street railroading."

And indeed, Edmonton continued to invest into new rails up until 1946, as well as rebuilding a burned streetcar due to wartime demand, testing new brake shoes and stop/go tail lights, etc. They did the best with what few resources they had.

Lastly, ERR/ETS administration did not close the door completely on retaining streetcar service, even as late as 1949.

"Mr. Thomas Ferrier, Manager of the Edmonton Street Railway, takes the position that Edmonton, even though it has grown extremely rapidly and now has an estimated population of close to 150,000, is not large enough to warrant the cost of a street-railway fixed plant in its transit system. He did, however, say that the North Edmonton line* would be retained for a few years, and, if they felt that Edmonton had continued to grow rapidly enough in the meantime, the line might be retained permanently and modernized. [...] Condition of track was an important factor in bringing about Trolley Coach conversion of most of the system. Mr. Ferrier said that if there had been good track throughout any one route, PCC’s would have been purchased. But North Edmonton was the only well-railed line."

Even in the dawn of the automobile era, Edmontonians remained avid transit riders. According to a ridership report in the ERRS Archive (Edmonton is RBT-21), the transit system served 47,995,000 riders in 1949-50 - including more than 10,000,000 on just the one remaining streetcar route by that point. That works out to around 330 transit rides per Edmontonian. In contrast, ETS served 87,646,600 riders last year, which works out to around 73 rides per Edmontonian (compare that to the roughly 69 rides per resident on that one streetcar route).

*The 'North Edmonton Line', by that time, was simply the part of the main streetcar line that was north of 97 Ave. Palmer said of it: "[...] "the last best hope” of the system, this is the heaviest route. Its track was relaid in the late 1920’s at a cost of $185,000 per mile, and is in superb condition today." At the time, residents had recently voted yes in a referendum to convert the streetcar deck of the HLB to four vehicle lanes. After delays and cost increases, it went to a second plebicite, where there was a majority in favour but this time not the 2/3rds necessary, so the project was cancelled. That's why the "North Edmonton Line" was not the only part of the system to remain in service until 1951.

You can learn more in this Wikipedia article I wrote, or the sources I cited in it—which are even better.
 
Last edited:
Barnaby said:
Sad that we're only getting some of the streetcar lines back. Getting back to all the old areas should be a 10 year plan.
Click to expand...
actually we have a brand new streetcar/tram line. The VLSE is a tram line (in fact Toronto uses the same cars for their streetcar route). Yes Edmonton calls it urban LRT as a marketing feature, but what is the difference from a street car line. Not sure how many of the old lines would/could/should be revived, but there is a significant cost to maintain, and well, Edmonton isn't known for that...
 
CplKlinger said:
In Edmonton, it was moreso because the city was too broke during the Great Depression to invest almost anything more than light maintenance - like replacing old rail and streetcars. In 1937, city admin recommended switching completely to trolley (and some gas) buses rather than trying to tackle what was then a huge infrastructure deficit, and a 1938 consultant report agreed. World War 2 paradoxically bought the streetcars some more time, since bus deliveries almost completely halted during the war, while also putting more strain on the system than it could handle. Foster Palmer, a Harvard librarian who shot colour footage of Edmonton's streetcar network, among others, in 1949/50, noted that Edmonton was actually a rare exception among North American cities:

"Edmonton provides an interesting contrast to cities which will not spend a penny on new street-car facilities after a decision for eventual abandonment has been made. The management here is trying very hard to provide good service in a rapidly growing community. Service on Route 1 is excellent in frequency (3 to 5 minutes), but rather slow. The Calder line has ten minute service during most of the day, which is very good considering its outlying location. All trolley fans who can still possibly do so should visit Edmonton while the cars still run. The High Level Bridge is one of the true “greats” in street railroading."

And indeed, Edmonton continued to invest into new rails up until 1946, as well as rebuilding a burned streetcar due to wartime demand, testing new brake shoes and stop/go tail lights, etc. They did the best with what few resources they had.

Lastly, ERR/ETS administration did not close the door completely on retaining streetcar service, even as late as 1949.

"Mr. Thomas Ferrier, Manager of the Edmonton Street Railway, takes the position that Edmonton, even though it has grown extremely rapidly and now has an estimated population of close to 150,000, is not large enough to warrant the cost of a street-railway fixed plant in its transit system. He did, however, say that the North Edmonton line* would be retained for a few years, and, if they felt that Edmonton had continued to grow rapidly enough in the meantime, the line might be retained permanently and modernized. [...] Condition of track was an important factor in bringing about Trolley Coach conversion of most of the system. Mr. Ferrier said that if there had been good track throughout any one route, PCC’s would have been purchased. But North Edmonton was the only well-railed line."

Even in the dawn of the automobile era, Edmontonians remained avid transit riders. According to a ridership report in the ERRS Archive (Edmonton is RBT-21), the transit system served 47,995,000 riders in 1949-50 - including more than 10,000,000 on just the one remaining streetcar route by that point. That works out to around 330 transit rides per Edmontonian. In contrast, ETS served 87,646,600 riders last year, which works out to around 73 rides per Edmontonian (compare that to the roughly 69 rides per resident on that one streetcar route).

*The 'North Edmonton Line', by that time, was simply the part of the main streetcar line that was north of 97 Ave. Palmer said of it: "[...] "the last best hope” of the system, this is the heaviest route. Its track was relaid in the late 1920’s at a cost of $185,000 per mile, and is in superb condition today." At the time, residents had recently voted yes in a referendum to convert the streetcar deck of the HLB to four vehicle lanes. After delays and cost increases, it went to a second plebicite, where there was a majority in favour but this time not the 2/3rds necessary, so the project was cancelled. That's why the "North Edmonton Line" was not the only part of the system to remain in service until 1951.

You can learn more in this Wikipedia article I wrote, or the sources I cited in it—which are even better.
Click to expand...

Thanks for sharing that great info/link.
 
Habibfazil said:
Edmonton calls it urban LRT as a marketing feature, but what is the difference from a street car line.
Click to expand...
Low floor LRT and streetcar service do have many similarities, but there are important differences too. Namely, streetcars more often than not share their right-of-way with vehicles (though there are some exceptions, like with some routes in Toronto), whereas low floor LRT has segregated rights-of-way from traffic and usually gives partial or full priority for trains at intersections. As well, low floor LRT systems are more likely than streetcar systems to couple two or more vehicles together. Lastly, streetcar stops tend to have similar spacing to buses (I.e., every two blocks), while low floor LRT stops are spaced further apart.

All that is to say, low floor LRT has the potential to serve more passengers more quickly than streetcar lines, but their stops are further apart. And bear in mind too that modern streetcars have much higher capacity than even articulated buses, so combined with their lower maintenance costs than buses they are still great for high-demand routes.
 
CplKlinger said:
In Edmonton, it was moreso because the city was too broke during the Great Depression to invest almost anything more than light maintenance - like replacing old rails and streetcars. In 1937, city admin recommended switching completely to trolley (and some gas) buses rather than trying to tackle what was then a huge infrastructure deficit, and a 1938 consultant report agreed. World War 2 paradoxically bought the streetcars some more time, since bus deliveries almost completely halted during the war, while also putting more strain on the system than it could handle. Foster Palmer, a Harvard librarian who shot colour footage of Edmonton's streetcar network, among others, in 1949/50, noted that Edmonton was actually a rare exception among North American cities:

"Edmonton provides an interesting contrast to cities which will not spend a penny on new street-car facilities after a decision for eventual abandonment has been made. The management here is trying very hard to provide good service in a rapidly growing community. Service on Route 1 is excellent in frequency (3 to 5 minutes), but rather slow. The Calder line has ten minute service during most of the day, which is very good considering its outlying location. All trolley fans who can still possibly do so should visit Edmonton while the cars still run. The High Level Bridge is one of the true “greats” in street railroading."

And indeed, Edmonton continued to invest into new rails up until 1946, as well as rebuilding a burned streetcar due to wartime demand, testing new brake shoes and stop/go tail lights, etc. They did the best with what few resources they had.

Lastly, ERR/ETS administration did not close the door completely on retaining streetcar service, even as late as 1949.

"Mr. Thomas Ferrier, Manager of the Edmonton Street Railway, takes the position that Edmonton, even though it has grown extremely rapidly and now has an estimated population of close to 150,000, is not large enough to warrant the cost of a street-railway fixed plant in its transit system. He did, however, say that the North Edmonton line* would be retained for a few years, and, if they felt that Edmonton had continued to grow rapidly enough in the meantime, the line might be retained permanently and modernized. [...] Condition of track was an important factor in bringing about Trolley Coach conversion of most of the system. Mr. Ferrier said that if there had been good track throughout any one route, PCC’s would have been purchased. But North Edmonton was the only well-railed line."

Even in the dawn of the automobile era, Edmontonians remained avid transit riders. According to a ridership report in the ERRS Archive (Edmonton is RBT-21), the transit system served 47,995,000 riders in 1949-50 - including more than 10,000,000 on just the one remaining streetcar route by that point. That works out to around 330 transit rides per Edmontonian. In contrast, ETS served 87,646,600 riders last year, which works out to around 73 rides per Edmontonian (compare that to the roughly 69 rides per resident on that one streetcar route).

*The 'North Edmonton Line', by that time, was simply the part of the main streetcar line that was north of 97 Ave. Palmer said of it: "[...] "the last best hope” of the system, this is the heaviest route. Its track was relaid in the late 1920’s at a cost of $185,000 per mile, and is in superb condition today." At the time, residents had recently voted yes in a referendum to convert the streetcar deck of the HLB to four vehicle lanes. After delays and cost increases, it went to a second plebicite, where there was a majority in favour but this time not the 2/3rds necessary, so the project was cancelled. That's why the "North Edmonton Line" was not the only part of the system to remain in service until 1951.

You can learn more in this Wikipedia article I wrote, or the sources I cited in it—which are even better.
Click to expand...
I always noticed looking at pictures from the final days of streetcar service that most of the equipment from from the 1910s. Streetcars tend to last longer than buses in service, but there's definitely this sense of a fleet that's on its last legs.
 
The_Cat said:
GM puchased a lot of streetcar lines around 1951 and they were bulldozed. I think there would be some value restoring some of the old routes.
Click to expand...
That's a bit of a myth.
www.vox.com

The real story behind the demise of America's once-mighty streetcars

Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money...
www.vox.com www.vox.com

Of course, National City Lines has nothing to do with Canada. I don't think there were any privately owned streetcar lines in Canada by the 1940's, although a few interurban operations existed.

Edit: the BC Electric Railway was still private so there was 1 private city street railway beyond the 1940's in Vancouver.
 
Last edited:
So I was happy to see that the Davies park n ride lot with a ton more vehicles yesterday when zi went to Cariwest. It was by no means full, but probably the most cars I've seen there so far. This is definitely one of the best places now on the southside for parking when going downtown to Folk fest and other festivals.
 
Edmcowboy11 said:
So I was happy to see that the Davies park n ride lot with a ton more vehicles yesterday when zi went to Cariwest. It was by no means full, but probably the most cars I've seen there so far. This is definitely one of the best places now on the southside for parking when going downtown to Folk fest and other festivals.
Click to expand...
Makes sense. Comic Con was also happening, so I'd assume many took the train to the ECC from there.

DT was very busy last night. NOFX concert, Cariwest, Comic Con, U18 hockey. Definitely a lot of irregular visitors, plenty were international in the Ice District.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top