Kosy123
Active Member
Seems like another open pit concept that could be saved by Cidex (maybe?)
CIDEX TO THE RESCUESeems like another open pit concept that could be saved by Cidex (maybe?)
The problem with selling a site with an open pit and expiring shoring is the cost can be a killer if they need to do shoring repairs, also they are now limited to what they can do based off the shoring designs. Not an easy recovery.
Also... It was pretty obvious this site would eventually go up for sale
Not entirely true. We are seeing a lot more interest in Vancouver/Toronto-based developers in Alberta right now as conditions in those respective markets remain tough. Institutional owners recycle through their assets constantly for the most part.Good news. I still think Toronto and Vancouver developers are pulling out of Alberta due to liquidity issues, mostly.
This area, and Edmonton's current market isn't the reason behind the failure to build this.
Autograph or MacLab are probably the two most equipped to take this on asap. As much as I like Westrich, I think they probably have enough going on right now.
Happy to hear. I'm sure the list of stable developers is smaller in these cities than it was 3/4 years ago.Not entirely true. We are seeing a lot more interest in Vancouver/Toronto-based developers in Alberta right now as conditions in those respective markets remain tough. Institutional owners recycle through their assets constantly for the most part.
With this site there are many developers that would be interested in it for many reasons.
If you had to split up their Alberta interest between Calgary and Edmonton, what would you think that split would look like? 50/50? 75/25?Not entirely true. We are seeing a lot more interest in Vancouver/Toronto-based developers in Alberta right now as conditions in those respective markets remain tough. Institutional owners recycle through their assets constantly for the most part.
With this site there are many developers that would be interested in it for many reasons.