|
|
|
Riley's 108 Street Redevelopment | 20.2m | 6s | J+S Architect
- Thread starter Avenuer
- Start date
Kosy123
Active Member
Aw would’ve loved a tower or something like the Hat@122 in this spot but good to see some momentum nonetheless!
Munanyo
Active Member
Definitely a sign of confidence for downtown and overall really exciting news. But I agree that I wish this could've been a tower of similar height to The Parks development going on across the street. Or at least a tower of some sort that could have added to the skyline.
No complaints from me though, design is safe but pleasant, and getting rid of some old dilapidated buildings, especially in the core, is a huge win. I can't wait to see what the area looks like in 5 years from now. Could be a real happening place.
No complaints from me though, design is safe but pleasant, and getting rid of some old dilapidated buildings, especially in the core, is a huge win. I can't wait to see what the area looks like in 5 years from now. Could be a real happening place.
Canadian 001
Active Member
Good that it is 6 floors
anything lower would've sucked
anything lower would've sucked
IanO
Senior Member
Works for me and expect to see far more of this product on central/Downtown-ish lots.
Reminds me of when we saw low-rise projects in the core in the early 2000s because numbers didn't work for towers, but demand was there for central living.
Reminds me of when we saw low-rise projects in the core in the early 2000s because numbers didn't work for towers, but demand was there for central living.
Filip.Nowak
Active Member
No retail on capital Blvd? 
How many units?
How many units?
IanO
Senior Member
^it would be nice to retail a small CRU on the corner for most blocks.
supaflyryguy
New Member
This should have a couple CRU's and be 10-12 stories minimum. Low-rise in the heard of dowtown is a fail.
IanO
Senior Member
Given Edmonton's what '300yrs of zoned FAR', maybe this is a better solution outside of the CBD to get things going, density and more complete blocks?
Greenspace
Senior Member
Great density given all the land we have, I agree.
Just need to what the zoning/plan says about retail at grade, perhaps just a corner CRU is necessary or along 102 Ave.
Just need to what the zoning/plan says about retail at grade, perhaps just a corner CRU is necessary or along 102 Ave.
Avenuer
Senior Member
We have so many empty CRUs downtown already I am fine with this not having anything.
Kosy123
Active Member
Honestly I'm of the same mind, the Parks should have some CRU units too nearby, here's hoping someone sees this and the Parks (along with the Shift a few blocks over) and it gets some momentum similar to 124 St and 102 Ave.
itom987
Active Member
30 more of these please!
MacLac
Senior Member
Whose the developer?
Canadian 001
Active Member
Hopefully not BCMnicheRegency Partnership
But My Serious Guesses:
Westrich
Pangnam
Leston
Cidex
Casica
Rohit
Parkwood
Autograph
PK developments
ONE Properties
Anthem Properties
Truman (Calgary company)
Some other random country
The Bold ones are the ones that may be correct?
But My Serious Guesses:
Westrich
Pangnam
Leston
Cidex
Casica
Rohit
Parkwood
Autograph
PK developments
ONE Properties
Anthem Properties
Truman (Calgary company)
Some other random country
The Bold ones are the ones that may be correct?
Last edited: