Greenspace
Senior Member
Height is really not the issues, it's the floorplate of each tower is MASSIVE compared to most buildings. The site is very large but the tower floorplates are like office towers, not your typical slim residential tower.
Or the Quest or Icons^Is that Omega?!![]()
104th St Downtown should really be renamed to Lameham Lane.
That's not a compliment, either.
Well…at least it’s not grey or beige?
So stucco is still a thing I see... 2007 wants its materials backOf all the towers under construction in Edmonton, this is one of them.
View attachment 516871View attachment 516872
Oops, guess I missed that. I don't understand what the big deal about the looks is then, it's not going to affect the skyline that much, and it's not like it's a legitimately ugly building, just bland and uninteresting. I think the idea that every building has to be some unique and modern glass walled tower is counter to the development of more housing in the core. It's simply more expensive to make everything look totally futuristic. That would drive up housing prices and slow down development.But it will be under 140m.
This one tower will probably be around 100m and the second one around 120m. The heights listed on the top are from before it was reduced.
Give it ten years and it will develop a nice patina of dust and grime just like Omega, don't worry!Well…at least it’s not grey or beige?