archited
Senior Member
Because they are "green" at the development game and therefore the concept is a "long" shot?
Edmonton Motors Lands Redevelopment | 170.07m | 56s | Pangman
- Thread starter Daveography
- Start date
bodsbods9090
Active Member
Think we'll see some movement on this project this year?
archited
Senior Member
^ doubtful.
_Citizen_Dane_
Active Member
^Which is a shame, because with the exception of 96th thru 92nd Streets, this is probably the portion of Jasper that's in the most desperate need of some love.
Given the proposal, I feel like this is more likely to go than Greenview and even Emerald. Will depend on how far along they are with actual drawings.
retiredfire
Active Member
looks like thier doing some testing today
Kaizen
Senior Member
Very cool !
bodsbods9090
Active Member
Like I said earlier, AIMCO has put some money behind this proposal so I imagine this may be more likely to go than not.
archited
Senior Member
Maybe, but I doubt it.
Member Bio
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2015
- Messages
- 10,218
- Reaction score
- 23,070
- Location
- Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
EDC Formal tentatively scheduled for May 5:
E. UPCOMING APPLICATIONS, CONFLICTS AND REGRETS (May 5, 2020)
Edmonton Motors Formal / DP Kevin McKee
E. UPCOMING APPLICATIONS, CONFLICTS AND REGRETS (May 5, 2020)
Edmonton Motors Formal / DP Kevin McKee
Avenuer
Senior Member
archited
Senior Member
I wonder what the buffer looks like when two adjacent properties dig their parking pits at the same time?
Member Bio
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2015
- Messages
- 10,218
- Reaction score
- 23,070
- Location
- Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
@archited I wonder if both companies could find some savings if they jointly went in on a single excavation contract?
I have mixed feelings about that podium. I like the colour, I like that bit between the towers that juts out and of course the ample windows surrounding the street level, but otherwise it's a bit busy and still a lot of grey. It's not bad and pretty different from anything we have today, though, but on balance my vote remains "Meh."
I have mixed feelings about that podium. I like the colour, I like that bit between the towers that juts out and of course the ample windows surrounding the street level, but otherwise it's a bit busy and still a lot of grey. It's not bad and pretty different from anything we have today, though, but on balance my vote remains "Meh."
archited
Senior Member
@Daveography that would be an ideal that is likely very hard to achieve -- agreement required on contractor, start date, cost sharing, engineering, and who's mother is the kindest and most generous.
As to your review on the podium for the towers, I am in general agreement with you. I still think there are major achievements available in this area and Kirkor has done much better in the past. My biggest thing is the lack of thought that goes into the space between the towers. It could have been a "jigsaw"-like lane that would have had appeal to the whole of Glenora. As rendered, it is a little too architectonic and not enough user-friendly -- a missed opportunity.
As to your review on the podium for the towers, I am in general agreement with you. I still think there are major achievements available in this area and Kirkor has done much better in the past. My biggest thing is the lack of thought that goes into the space between the towers. It could have been a "jigsaw"-like lane that would have had appeal to the whole of Glenora. As rendered, it is a little too architectonic and not enough user-friendly -- a missed opportunity.
_urbanite
Senior Member
Snapped this the other day. Cidex Group's logo on the old Edmonton Motors sign. Did they purchase the west half of the site (115 st - 116 st)?