IanO
Superstar
Percent increases don't share the right story here... actual numbers would be far more valuable and telling.
Its not only the year over year increase, but a number of other positive things noted as wellThe story itself talks about the slump we've been in for the last 10 years, and year of year increases.
On top of affordability, anecdotal evidence from a few people I have met recently also points out that some of the out-of-province buyers are also looking into having some semblance of urban living that, while not comparable to their places of origin (Van and TO, especially), at least keeps them somewhat entertained.The relative affordability of single-detached homes also means many buyers weren't starting with condos as their first choice, but higher borrowing costs are changing those calculations. Ng said he's seeing a significant spike in interest from out-of-province buyers looking at relocating to Edmonton, and they're considering condos and townhouses too.
Precisely. And while my evidence is anecdotal, it stands to reason (and statistics) that there is a large demographic that wants affordability, but doesn't want suburban living. It might take a few years, but I won't be surprise if the demand for a better urban experience starts to change our central areas (and other centre-adjacent ones as well). And not only from the big developers and retailers' side, but a lot of these people might end up being entrepreneurs themselves.Exactly, the people coming here for affordability are not only people looking to buy houses in the suburbs. Condos here are more affordable too, renting is more affordable.
So those people are coming from places that have more vibrant urban living, will bring a demand for more of that here and may change the culture here for the better.
I can speak for myself - we chose to move to Edmonton specifically to avoid having to live in the far flung suburbs. Things in Vancouver were looking more and more like if we wanted to buy and settle down, we'd have to end up in Surrey, Langley, or worse Abbotsford or Chilliwack, stuck with both a small space and an absurd commute.Precisely. And while my evidence is anecdotal, it stands to reason (and statistics) that there is a large demographic that wants affordability, but doesn't want suburban living. It might take a few years, but I won't be surprise if the demand for a better urban experience starts to change our central areas (and other centre-adjacent ones as well). And not only from the big developers and retailers' side, but a lot of these people might end up being entrepreneurs themselves.
Good urban experiences require safe, clean and well maintained streets. It's gotten better but no where near where we need to be, we slid back during the pandemic and still requires coordinated effort and continued investments in safety as well as streetscape upgrades and ongoing maintenance. This is the most important aspect of attracting people to high-density urban living.
I have a question for all about complete streets - streets designed and operated to enable safe use and support mobility for all users. These include people of all ages and abilities, regardless of whether they are travelling as drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, or public transportation riders.
Not all streets will be or need to be complete streets, but in terms of that definition, what do people think is Edmonton's best example of a complete street?
Is it 124 st with some of the recent improvements made there? Will it be 104 Ave which has multiple users that will be accommodated? Or where?
I like the very simple streetscape of 96 St in the Quarters. It feels safe to walk, bike, drive in that stretch. It's a shame it's devoid of development, but I'd like to see more of that sort of street design. It doesn't have to be brick, you could do it with asphalt or concrete too. It's the amorphous edges and the tight vehicular row that make it work.I have a question for all about complete streets - streets designed and operated to enable safe use and support mobility for all users. These include people of all ages and abilities, regardless of whether they are travelling as drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, or public transportation riders.
Not all streets will be or need to be complete streets, but in terms of that definition, what do people think is Edmonton's best example of a complete street?
Is it 124 st with some of the recent improvements made there? Will it be 104 Ave which has multiple users that will be accommodated? Or where?
Reference ID: | Job No 501214990-002 |
Description: | Exterior Alteration, Demolition |
Location: | 10246 - 104 STREET NW Plan NB1 Blk 4 Lots 173-174 |
Applicant: | 607816 ALBERTA LTD., HENRY |
Status: | Intake Review |
Create Date: | 2024-02-19T20:52:09Z |
Neighbourhood: | DOWNTOWN |