News   Apr 03, 2020
 9.7K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.7K     0 

Jasper Avenue New Vision / Imagine Jasper Avenue

Pedestrians have also wondered why they can't have sequenced lights here, but when it comes to priority I suspect the order is as given, motorists first, cyclists second and pedestrians after that.

I realize the inherent conflicts given the different speeds everyone travels at. We don't have a very pedestrian friendly downtown because they at best an after thought or more often just ignored.

I wouldn't even include cyclists in your priority list. The city does not want cyclists on Jasper Ave. There is infrastructure for pedestrians and cars, not for bikes on Jasper Ave as the safer option is a block off with protected lanes. Not many cyclists dare to use Jasper so having any consideration for light sequencing for bikes doesn't make sense.
 
Pedestrians have also wondered why they can't have sequenced lights here, but when it comes to priority I suspect the order is as given, motorists first, cyclists second and pedestrians after that.

I realize the inherent conflicts given the different speeds everyone travels at. We don't have a very pedestrian friendly downtown because they at best an after thought or more often just ignored.
It may not be possible to sequence the lights - particularly in both directions - for either pedestrians or cars BUT shortening the timing of lights (particularly at those stupid scramble intersections) so that cars and pedestrians aren’t sitting or standing for interminable lengths of time before being able to proceed would make the street a better experience for all.
 
I wouldn't even include cyclists in your priority list. The city does not want cyclists on Jasper Ave. There is infrastructure for pedestrians and cars, not for bikes on Jasper Ave as the safer option is a block off with protected lanes. Not many cyclists dare to use Jasper so having any consideration for light sequencing for bikes doesn't make sense.
Yes, it is true the bike lanes are north and south of Jasper Avenue. I have seen cyclists from time to time on Jasper Avenue (even have done it myself years ago), but it is not common now.

However, regardless the discussion here and with the city in general seems to revolve around cyclists more than pedestrians downtown.
 
It may not be possible to sequence the lights - particularly in both directions - for either pedestrians or cars BUT shortening the timing of lights (particularly at those stupid scramble intersections) so that cars and pedestrians aren’t sitting or standing for interminable lengths of time before being able to proceed would make the street a better experience for all.

Yes. I'd like to see the length of light cycles addressed better.
 
It's been over 2 weeks since they reopened Jasper Ave, but they still haven't bothered replacing the old lights/traffic signals with the new lights/traffic signals. Have they suddenly decided to hibernate for the winter?

View attachment 699909

View attachment 699910


I also noticed that the new lights between 114 St - 117 St are not the same as the new lights that were installed in the 109 St - 114 St section a couple of years ago.

View attachment 699911

View attachment 699912

Someone please tell me they'll fix the outstanding issues from 114 St-117 St this spring?
 
These arrived in mailboxes a few days ago

20260313_163234.jpg
 
Screenshot 2026-03-16 at 3.25.32 PM.png

The City has to figure out a way to do more in this regard. They can absolutely leave businesses stranded for very long periods of time leading to failures that might otherwise have succeeded. They should have a temporary "partnership" with businesses affected by the area closures working on incentives to keep the public interest at a high level. The City Administration is/has been very poor at this.
 
View attachment 722568
The City has to figure out a way to do more in this regard. They can absolutely leave businesses stranded for very long periods of time leading to failures that might otherwise have succeeded. They should have a temporary "partnership" with businesses affected by the area closures working on incentives to keep the public interest at a high level. The City Administration is/has been very poor at this.
This, along with travel delays, may be people's greatest concerns. Their What to expect flyer kind of addresses the former as indicated, but doesn't say anything about the later at all.

Would it kill them to say something like "expect travel delays of 5 to 15 minutes during the construction period" or are they trying to pretend there is no inconvenience here, or minimize it?
 
I noticed that the street lights between 114 St and 116 St are now replaced. Just need to replace the traffic lights at 116 St and 117 St.
Also, there are orange signs stating that Jasper Ave construction delays between 117 St and 121 St will begin next week.
 

Back
Top