constance_chlore
Senior Member
LRT view:
|
|
|
Westrich McKernan-Belgravia | 22m | 6s | Westrich Pacific Corp. | JS Architect
- Thread starter Avenuer
- Start date
northlands
Senior Member
Member Bio
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
- Messages
- 2,735
- Reaction score
- 11,548
- Location
- The trenches (Downtown)
Ask and ye shall receive
Glenco
Senior Member
CplKlinger
Senior Member
@IanO I know the green isn't there to stay, but there's no reason it couldn't. Westrich could have the first mint chip building in the city!
archited
Senior Member
Actually, humor aside, it is probably going to end up looking better than its replacement -- and i suspect that you kind of like it @CplKlinger (I know I do).
northlands
Senior Member
Member Bio
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
- Messages
- 2,735
- Reaction score
- 11,548
- Location
- The trenches (Downtown)
Edmcowboy11
Senior Member
Taken: 27 November 2025
supplanter
Active Member
can’t remember where I saw/heard but I think there’ll be some stone cladding on the South elevation? Very anxious to see how that’ll look
thommyjo
Senior Member
fromyeg
Active Member
Address: 11414 - 76 AVENUE NW
Description: The City has received a rezoning application from Green Space Alliance. The current zone is a Direct Control Zone (DC2.1239) and the proposed zone is a Direct Control Zone (DC). Key proposed changes include: -A reduction to the required ground floor commercial space. A commercial space will be retained in the southeast corner of the site. -Converting the removed commercial area to residential dwellings with an increase in density from 113 to 118 dwellings. -Revisions to the building's exterior finishing materials. Administrative updates are also required to update the uses, terms, and regulations in the zone in alignment with Zoning Bylaw 20001’s writing standards. In the Scona District Plan, the site is located within the 114 Street Secondary Corridor.
Status: In Review
File Number: LDA25-0526
Rezoning for the site.
Description: The City has received a rezoning application from Green Space Alliance. The current zone is a Direct Control Zone (DC2.1239) and the proposed zone is a Direct Control Zone (DC). Key proposed changes include: -A reduction to the required ground floor commercial space. A commercial space will be retained in the southeast corner of the site. -Converting the removed commercial area to residential dwellings with an increase in density from 113 to 118 dwellings. -Revisions to the building's exterior finishing materials. Administrative updates are also required to update the uses, terms, and regulations in the zone in alignment with Zoning Bylaw 20001’s writing standards. In the Scona District Plan, the site is located within the 114 Street Secondary Corridor.
Status: In Review
File Number: LDA25-0526
Rezoning for the site.
constance_chlore
Senior Member
Seen on the side of Encore Tower
constance_chlore
Senior Member
Also, this is funny to look back on in light of what we see two posts up.
degrandprix
Active Member
I am liking the current renders compared to those on page 1. They now have only 3 types of cladding instead of 5, and they seem to go together better. High-visibility bike racks added in front of the CRU as well.
This might turn out quite nice!
whattheheck
Active Member
^If that's the final look, then that is acceptable. LRT adjacent is another plus.
My only caveat here: most of this type of infill is geared towards renters. There's nothing wrong with renters. But, I worry we're turning into a city of renters. Home ownership brings so much stability. I get it, prices are high. But, so too, are rents. It seems we're putting our society into a perpetual 'monthly payment' mode for everything. That does not lead to financial stability.
Also, how much of infill like this will actually attract families? Yes, I get we're not in the time of the traditional family in some mindsets. But we still are. For infill to work/ be effective, it ALSO needs to attract families willing to live in such density. But, I reckon, once a couple of kids comes along, buildings like this will not be ideal for that.
My only caveat here: most of this type of infill is geared towards renters. There's nothing wrong with renters. But, I worry we're turning into a city of renters. Home ownership brings so much stability. I get it, prices are high. But, so too, are rents. It seems we're putting our society into a perpetual 'monthly payment' mode for everything. That does not lead to financial stability.
Also, how much of infill like this will actually attract families? Yes, I get we're not in the time of the traditional family in some mindsets. But we still are. For infill to work/ be effective, it ALSO needs to attract families willing to live in such density. But, I reckon, once a couple of kids comes along, buildings like this will not be ideal for that.
Offworld
Active Member
it is my past understanding that compared to some other cities across Western North America, Edmonton has historically had a comparatively large cohort of renters. Not a judgement, just a statement.
Don't forget that renting can be an optimal choice for some. It's not a dead-end. For many, it can be a lifesaver. (Said this renter.)