Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Calendar
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
News
Apr 03, 2020
From the Editor: A Message to Our Readers
9.5K
3
News
Apr 02, 2020
Topping Off March 2020: What's Hot on SkyriseEdmonton
10K
0
News
Apr 02, 2020
News Roundup for April 2, 2020
3.6K
0
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
itom987's latest activity
I
itom987
reacted to
johnnyboy's post
in the thread
Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates
with
Like
.
I’ve already stated where I stand on this, but I'll say it again: this proposal is a terrible outcome for a key downtown site, no matter...
Yesterday at 8:26 AM
I
itom987
reacted to
The_Cat's post
in the thread
Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton
with
Like
.
One LRT car can still hold up to 200 riders.
Saturday at 9:11 AM
I
itom987
reacted to
BrettB's post
in the thread
Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton
with
Like
.
I would take frequency over long trains any day of the week.
Saturday at 9:11 AM
I
itom987
reacted to
wormwood's post
in the thread
Downtown Real Estate
with
Haha
.
Westrich Parking Services
Saturday at 9:10 AM
I
itom987
reacted to
MacLac's post
in the thread
Connect Centre | 56.3m | 16s | ONE Properties | DIALOG
with
Like
.
Yup, it's in the video, "35 storey residential tower......" https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.7059212
Saturday at 9:07 AM
I
itom987
replied to the thread
Connect Tower - Office->Residential - Josan Properties - RHW
.
People walking their dogs on Rice Howard Way will keep the riffraff away.
Saturday at 8:59 AM
I
itom987
replied to the thread
Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates
.
I don't think any of this was IanO's idea, most likely it was his boss or someone from another department within the company that is...
Saturday at 8:49 AM
I
itom987
reacted to
TAS's post
in the thread
Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates
with
Angry
.
In listening to the presentation to EDC, the proponents say this area and space along 102 Ave can be made to be "active" and "festive"...
Saturday at 8:42 AM
I
itom987
reacted to
degrandprix's post
in the thread
Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates
with
Like
.
Also, rice howard parkade is 75M from this site and has 440 parking stalls. Library parkade is 165M away and has 860 stalls. We don't...
Friday at 12:28 PM
I
itom987
replied to the thread
Beaver Hills House Park & Michael Phair Park Renewal
.
Do those copper tiles have a protective coating to prevent patina? I hope they are fastened securely to prevent theft.
Thursday at 7:24 PM
I
itom987
replied to the thread
Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates
.
After watching the video there are some more points that I need to add. Instead of getting revenue from parking cars, move towards...
Thursday at 7:10 PM
I
itom987
reacted to
TAS's post
in the thread
Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates
with
Like
.
I seriously thought the city wasn't allowing any more new surface parking though (temporary or otherwise) in the downtown?
Tuesday at 6:13 PM
I
itom987
replied to the thread
O-day’min Park (formerly Warehouse Park)
.
What the fuck are the attendants supposed do when they are working, sit on their ass all day?
Jan 19, 2026
I
itom987
reacted to
TAS's post
in the thread
O-day’min Park (formerly Warehouse Park)
with
Angry
.
This morning. I'm starting to get 311 fatigue - but I'm stubborn.
Jan 19, 2026
I
itom987
reacted to
TAS's post
in the thread
Lilac Park | 20.2m | 6s | Westrich Pacific | J+S Architect
with
Like
.
Ah, I finally get it now. A block is only one side of one street, not both sides.
Jan 19, 2026
Members
Back
Top