Recent content by CplKlinger

This is coming to EDC on March 3.

Just a refresher, here are the old permit applications for 6655 Alpha Blvd.

Google maps says it is, and I think I recall seeing people there when I walked by the other day.

Chris was responding to my post; I had said I wasn't sure if the lights are on yet or not :)

Forgot to post this sooner, but the pedestrian lights at Kingsway are up now. When I saw them on Feb. 7, the lights were still covered. I don't know if they're on yet.

There are a couple of Streetside units facing the Mews, but where they really dropped the ball was not installing a gate in the fence along the Mews. People using those doors need to go all the way around to the alley. Hopefully this is something the condo board will address when it is formed...

Major Development Permit Reference Id: Job No 646019972-002 Description: To construct a Residential Use building in the form of a 4 Dwelling Row House with 4 Secondary Suites. Location: 5229 - BIPLANE LANE NW Plan 2521472 Blk 8 Lot 47 5235 - BIPLANE LANE NW Plan 2521472 Blk 8...

Here's the Schedule, just so others can see the numbers that @kcantor is analyzing.

Coming to the Executive Committee on March 4: Downtown Attainable Housing Program. "The Program would fund an estimated 570 to 850 attainable units, and up to 3400 total units depending on what proportion of units are attainable. This would leverage private investment, and support construction...

This one had been in the works for over a year, and at one point it was resubmitted with a slightly different unit count and a different architect altogether. I was starting to worry the developer would back out of it.

That makes two multi-storey mixed-use developments with approved DPs before construction season starts, very exciting! Fingers crossed the building permit review for them is quick enough that they can both break ground this year. Also, quick update on Streetside's unit sales:

Yeesh, I had no idea a restrictive covenant could regulate that sort of stuff. Here's the full document.

Was that part of the nodes/corridors package? They voted to send all of admin's district plan recommendations to public hearing, so if that was one of them, then yes.

The ones for moving the cap from 8 to 6 units on interior sites and increasing the minimum unit size on interior sites from 75m2 to 90m2 were rejected; debate on the main motion (moved by Knack & involves decreasing the maximum side wall height to 9.5m and creating a separate private tree...

Thanks for sharing, that sounds super interesting. I'm guessing there's some level of automated data scraping going on here, so I wonder how they audit the data to ensure accuracy/quality. I'm excited to dig more into this!