News   Apr 03, 2020
 9.2K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 3.4K     0 

O-day’min Park (formerly Warehouse Park)

From the Edmonton Journal:

O-day’min Park: the heart of a renewed community​

From parking lot to community park, O-day’min Park anchors the reinvention of this part of Edmonton.
Author of the article:
By Laura Severs
Published Dec 12, 2025

Edmonton Evolves​

Part 1: How starting with the development of a year-round park drives the thoughtful reinvention of a community.

Part 2: (coming next week) Inspiration other cities can take from Edmonton’s development playbook.

Parking lots dotting the centre of the city are disappearing — at least some of them.

In their place, just west of the downtown core, residential developments, including what some term the missing middle — low-rise apartments, in this instance slightly taller than the typical four or fewer storeys Canada Mortgage and Housing defines it as — are beginning to pop up as this part of Edmonton reinvents itself.

That land, on either side of 106th, 107th and 108th streets, just north of Jasper Avenue, is seeing a swath of surface parking lots transformed into much needed housing and more while also redefining how people will live in the city proper.

Today, in Part 1 of a two-part series, Postmedia looks at how this once-neglected area is changing. In Part 2, in next week’s Homes section, we talk to a former top city planner from eastern Canada who believes Edmonton is onto something and why he feels this way.

At least three developers have projects that are currently shovel ready, under construction or recently completed in the area surrounding the new O-day’min Park (formerly known as Warehouse Park).

The park, which opened last month, sits on what used to be home to multiples of parking spaces. It is 1.81 hectares, or put another way, the size of 4½ NFL football fields. Designed for year-round use, it includes an off-leash dog park, a basketball court, an exercise area, a playground, a gathering space with fire pits and has a pavilion with washrooms and space to rent for community events — the pavilion won a 2024 Canadian Architect Award of Excellence. This is all highlighted by a Northern Lights feature, a 200-metre long raised, circular-like lighting installation designed to reflect the magic of the aurora borealis.

The park, said Ian O’Donnell, is the real driver of the development the area is now seeing.

“When you’re looking at development, it’s about partnerships,” said O’Donnell, development manager at Westrich Pacific, which has three residential developments in play here, all adjacent or near the park. “The public investment of close to $50 million into the new O-day’min Park convinced us in the development industry that we need to come along and be a partner in the area. So that initial investment is going to lead to hundreds of millions of dollars in public investment around the park.”

Westrich’s three projects, Lotus Park, Lilac Park, and a yet to be named third residential building that just received the go-ahead, will bring some 600 residential rental units and about 750 new residents to this part of the city.
Lotus Park, at six storeys, will have 152 units but will not include parking aside from bicycle parking. This, said O’Donnell, allows Westrich to provide a more affordable urban living option and take advantage of its location: close to the downtown core, near the educational facilities of Norquest College and MacEwan University and near the new under construction LRT line.

“One of the high costs of development is providing parking and so this will be bit of a unique test case where residents will be able to have a more affordable rental unit,” said O’Donnell, who added that those who need parking will have access to it in a neighbouring building.

Just south of Lotus Park, which saw construction start earlier this year and should be completed by mid-2026, is Lilac Park. Lilac will be seven storeys, with 239 units and will have underground parking. Construction should start in the first quarter of 2026. Both buildings will have studios, one-, two- and three-bedroom units, gyms, and rooftop patios and barbecues, while Lilac will have a wellness spa as well as underground parking. Construction on Lilac is expected shortly. The third building, also to occupy the space of a surface parking lot, will have 201 units, and two levels of underground parking and will feature studio, one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments. It will be seven storeys and also include a wellness spa, gym and rooftop patio.

“Our focus is making our buildings highly interactive with a diversity of social space for residents,” said O’Donnell.
This third Westrich project is right next to another residential development waiting to break ground on another surface parking lot, this one from Autograph Group, the developer of the Mercury Block and other residential projects just off 124th Street and 102nd Avenue.
It was once going to be The Shift, two towers — one of 37 storeys, the other of 35; with 730 luxury rental apartments — atop a four-storey podium. But that was pre-COVID and the market shifted. Autograph has since had the land rezoned and is now looking at one building similar in size and scale to the Mercury Block, which is seven storeys, has 163 rental units with a courtyard surrounded by retail on the main level.

Then there’s the Parks from Maclab Development Group. Also right next to the park, and on the site of the former El Mirador apartments — known for its Spanish-like architecture — the 37-storey building has 363 rental suites with a mix of studios, one-, two- and three-bedroom rentals. This is Phase 1 and is more than 40 per cent leased; the first tenant moved in this past March. Phase 2, dependent on how Phase 1 does, would include a podium connecting to a 45-storey tower.

“(It’s about) investing in the area and believing in it becoming the next residential hub,” said O’Donnell, adding that there’s half a dozen developers looking at moving forward projects in this area.

The City of Edmonton expects that by November 2026 there will be a total of 1,604 residential units either completed or under construction in the immediate area of O-day’min Park.
 
O'day-min Park is by far the worst example of safe paths I have come across in my walks through downtown in terms of ice and traction.

It has never recovered from the first episode of thick ice that developed. They apply sand, which helps, then it gets swept off by the large brushes after snowfall. But the ice remains and gets polished. So crews have to keep applying new sand. I spoke to 2 crew members this morning on-site and they said they are limited in what they can apply.

As a result it's terrible. The city does not want to use any salt mixture - but that thick base layer of ice remains. It would just be better to keep layer of snow instead for better traction rather than removing it everytime.

Pics may not capture it. No traction. Very icy.

20251219_092832.jpg
20251219_092701.jpg
 
O'day-min Park is by far the worst example of safe paths I have come across in my walks through downtown in terms of ice and traction.

It has never recovered from the first episode of thick ice that developed. They apply sand, which helps, then it gets swept off by the large brushes after snowfall. But the ice remains and gets polished. So crews have to keep applying new sand. I spoke to 2 crew members this morning on-site and they said they are limited in what they can apply.

As a result it's terrible. The city does not want to use any salt mixture - but that thick base layer of ice remains. It would just be better to keep layer of snow instead for better traction rather than removing it everytime.

Pics may not capture it. No traction. Very icy.

View attachment 703951View attachment 703953

Sweden is developing and implementing environmentally friendly de-icing solutions, like mixtures with beet extract and cornstarch, that melt ice effectively for sidewalk safety while being safe for wildlife and the environment, reducing the harm caused by traditional salt. These innovations, including smarter salt use, focus on biodegradable ingredients that don't poison birds or damage soil and waterways, proving that road safety and ecological protection can coexist.
 
Yup the walkways have been pretty sadly treacherous. Guessing the flipside of the issue is they don't want to/can't use machinery to scrape the sidewalks bare for fear of damaging the concrete and/or voiding contractor warranty on it.

Hopefully next time it warms up a bit the City dispatches a crew with bladed shovels and hand scrapers to clear off the ice.

Overall, I think @archited had the right idea with heated sidewalks. If there was ever a spot to trial it out, this would have been it... but I can also already imagine the Sun editorials reading "our roads are INFESTED with POTHOLES while city council spends ALL YOUR TAX DOLLARS on HEATED SIDEWALKS in their new VANITY park for HOMELESS to use them as beds to do DRUGS and have SEX on them in front of your CHILDREN!"
 
Yup the walkways have been pretty sadly treacherous. Guessing the flipside of the issue is they don't want to/can't use machinery to scrape the sidewalks bare for fear of damaging the concrete and/or voiding contractor warranty on it.

Hopefully next time it warms up a bit the City dispatches a crew with bladed shovels and hand scrapers to clear off the ice.

Overall, I think @archited had the right idea with heated sidewalks. If there was ever a spot to trial it out, this would have been it... but I can also already imagine the Sun editorials reading "our roads are INFESTED with POTHOLES while city council spends ALL YOUR TAX DOLLARS on HEATED SIDEWALKS in their new VANITY park for HOMELESS to use them as beds to do DRUGS and have SEX on them in front of your CHILDREN!"

Thats where you have to show the financial impact and savings over time along with safety.
 
Tough situation with the paths, this new norm of freezing rain and thaws is something we need to figure out, and the park not about to be renovated to have heated paths. Deicing that pretty fresh concrete would be a bad idea.

Does sound like they have the order of operations off pretty badly. Sweep then sand, ideally though in conditions like this they move to something a little more angular for sanding with a larger size too to give better traction.
 
Last edited:
and the larks not about to be renovated to have heated paths
Not so -- in fact if anything suggests heated paths the recent weather event lays the need out quite clearly. Nothing can be done until summer (late spring) but then on top of what is existing could be a parging layer embedded with aluminum flakes (heat reflective) to create a smooth bed (1/8" max) and then interconnected heating pads (e.g. Nuheat) -- another 1/8" thickness; on top of that 2" of lightweight concrete (fibre-reinforced to protect the mats and seal out moisture; expansion joints could be silicone sealed) and then a finish layer of thin-set ceramic tile (3/4" thickness)... the total additional thickness to the path would be a tolerable 3". Temperature and Humidity sensors could be used to predict weather events combined with other predictive systems (radar) so that the call-for-heat pre-warms the path before the actual event occurs (when the snow/freezing rain starts falling it is already sublimating immediately it meets the path surface). This in fact could be a good test system for the installation of heated paths for all new work across the City, focussing first on well-used MUPs and Bike Paths along with downtown sidewalks and streets.
 
Y
Not so -- in fact if anything suggests heated paths the recent weather event lays the need out quite clearly. Nothing can be done until summer (late spring) but then on top of what is existing could be a parging layer embedded with aluminum flakes (heat reflective) to create a smooth bed (1/8" max) and then interconnected heating pads (e.g. Nuheat) -- another 1/8" thickness; on top of that 2" of lightweight concrete (fibre-reinforced to protect the mats and seal out moisture; expansion joints could be silicone sealed) and then a finish layer of thin-set ceramic tile (3/4" thickness)... the total additional thickness to the path would be a tolerable 3". Temperature and Humidity sensors could be used to predict weather events combined with other predictive systems (radar) so that the call-for-heat pre-warms the path before the actual event occurs (when the snow/freezing rain starts falling it is already sublimating immediately it meets the path surface). This in fact could be a good test system for the installation of heated paths for all new work across the City, focussing first on well-used MUPs and Bike Paths along with downtown sidewalks and streets.
You are describing something that might be technically possible, and I appreciate the vision. I am saying there’s no political or financial chance it happens, so it’s an operations issue in my mind.
 
Walking by along 106st entrance to the park - this has been like this for a couple of days. Not so good for pushing strollers, a mobility device, seniors. Not so welcoming to have to step over a windrow from the sidewalk to this $48million park onto icy walkways.
20251220_121658.jpg


Just down the block on the same street (in front of Autograph and the pottery shop) the sidewalk is clear and dry.
20251220_121751.jpg
 
I am saying there’s no political or financial chance it happens, so it’s an operations issue in my mind.
I get what you are saying. The opposite side of the coin is that from an OpEx standpoint this is actually cheaper than any other form of snow removal, both from an energy expenditure and a financial expenditure perspective. Sure there is a CapEx number but that can be recovered within a 10-year period. It makes sense financially and it is more environmentally friendly; it is cheaper from an insurance perspective and it is more aesthetic from a design perspective. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't happen other than stubborn, uninformed resistance from politicos.
 
I get what you are saying. The opposite side of the coin is that from an OpEx standpoint this is actually cheaper than any other form of snow removal, both from an energy expenditure and a financial expenditure perspective. Sure there is a CapEx number but that can be recovered within a 10-year period. It makes sense financially and it is more environmentally friendly; it is cheaper from an insurance perspective and it is more aesthetic from a design perspective. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't happen other than stubborn, uninformed resistance from politicos.
Of course all of that melted/sublimated water has to go somewhere or it will simply pool and refreeze slicker and thicker when the system is turned off. This might work in theory (there’s lots of parkade ramps that use similar systems albeit with drains at the bottom) but my guess is this ship has already sailed.
 
heated parkade ramps don't melt the snow to water which then runs down the ramp and into the drains. the snow melts and quickly turns to vapour. There's no build up of liquid water.
I beg to differ. During and after any major snowfall, the majority of that snow is turned into meltwater which does indeed flow down the ramp. Most ramps also incorporated channels to direct that flow. Only a relatively small portion of what falls is vaporized. If you don’t believe me, stand at the bottom of one during a major snowfall and see for yourself. The same holds true for a freezing rain.
 

Back
Top