News   Apr 03, 2020
From the Editor: A Message to Our Readers
 9.2K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
Topping Off March 2020: What's Hot on SkyriseEdmonton
 10K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
News Roundup for April 2, 2020
 3.3K     0 

Lotus Park | 20.2m | 6s | Westrich Pacific | J+S Architect

Actually, if true to plans, NorQuest next building will be 11 to 12 floors and the Maclab property on 102nd Ave will likely be a high-rise too (we should know when the student housing bonuses are announced). Autograph's building on 106 is also destined to be more than 6 storeys as well as the planned development for north of MF building. I think that the only confirmed 6-storeys belong to Westrich's efforts.
 
archited said:
Actually, if true to plans, NorQuest next building will be 11 to 12 floors and the Maclab property on 102nd Ave will likely be a high-rise too (we should know when the student housing bonuses are announced). Autograph's building on 106 is also destined to be more than 6 storeys as well as the planned development for north of MF building. I think that the only confirmed 6-storeys belong to Westrich's efforts.
Click to expand...

I read on here that Autogragh's will now be 6-7. And BLVD will be 6 right beside the Parks.
 
TAS said:
Yup, from article:

"Autograph president Henry Edgar told Taproot the company now plans to construct buildings between six- and seven-storeys with up to 250 units."
Click to expand...
Losing the Shift towers is such a disappointment still… would have been an awesome extension of the CBD skyline a bit more westward. The 104st wall is so flat still.
 
TAS said:
I read on here that Autogragh's will now be 6-7. And BLVD will be 6 right beside the Parks.
Click to expand...
I think that quote was in reference to their buildings on 102nd Avenue and 123rd Street, not a new "mantra".
 
TAS said:
Yup, from article:

"Autograph president Henry Edgar told Taproot the company now plans to construct buildings between six- and seven-storeys with up to 250 units."
Click to expand...
I wonder if that is "250 units" per each building? Or all in? Didn't they rezone the lot for some outrageous number of occupants in the 1000's?
 
archited said:
I think that quote was in reference to their buildings on 102nd Avenue and 123rd Street, not a new "mantra".
Click to expand...

"Autograph Group, the developer of The Shift at 10157 106 Street just east of the park, had initially proposed to build two towers, at 38 and 35 storeys, with 780 units. But in September, Autograph successfully applied to rezone the lot to allow for much shorter buildings. Autograph president Henry Edgar told Taproot the company now plans to construct buildings between six- and seven-storeys with up to 250 units."
 
Taken 5th October 2025
1000003569.jpg

Sitting here across the street from the park it's interesting seeing where Lotus is going and where Lilac will be going. Also very fascinating looking at all the lots here on 106st, 107st and even 108st and just imagining how different this area would be with a bunch of residential and/or mixed use residential with CRU at street level.
 
MacLac said:
I wonder if that is "250 units" per each building? Or all in? Didn't they rezone the lot for some outrageous number of occupants in the 1000's?
Click to expand...

The underlying zone, Urban Warehouse, went from 500 units/ha to 2200.

ie. a 37,500 sqft site (very common size - 5 of 50 x 150 lots)

Previous (500) = ~174 units
Update (2200) = ~765

Your bigger issue is going to be your parking ratio, utility capacities and market absorption, among others.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top