thommyjo
Senior Member
I still think this is a false dichotomy though.Almost like they have no place to go. Spend all the money you want on enforcement and unless you are willing to haul everyone to jail (Edmonton Remand is already the largest prison in Canada) then you are just moving the problem around. Push them out of transit and they will be in business entryways.
Until people have a place to go its just an endless game of whack-a-mole on the taxpayer dime.
Of course we need long term solutions.
But we can also say, for the meantime, if there are going to be unhoused people, we should minimize their negative impacts on other citizens too. Why should a 19 year old girl going to uni on the train need to worry about getting stabbed by the methhead tripping on the platform? It’s inexcusable.
If people are going to sleep outside, use drugs, etc, we should seek to keep them in places that reduces overall crime, violence, and disorder. Letting them stay in our most high value, busy, and critical infrastructure…train stations….it’s stupid. It’s not a short term solution, and obviously not a long term one either.
There are many other places in the short term that are better than train shelters and stations.
We can’t let great stop good. Housing everyone and stopping drug use and doing all the right things would be great. But “good” also looks like ensuring innocent, everyday, and often vulnerable (elderly, female, youth, disabled) people can safely use a transit system they rely on. That’s a very fair expectation.
I’m very happy to “move the problem around” in the short term of it means transit is safe and attractive to use.