Freedm
Active Member
Alright, so potholes are happening again, and they are literally my least favourite thing about living in Edmonton and every spring I get frustrated that after all these years we still haven't been able to get this issue under control. I always thought there must be a way to make asphalt stronger, or perhaps we should just be using more concrete, at least at intersections or major roadways. Yes, I know concrete is more expensive, but in the long run it should still be worth it. Even Alberta Transportation, in regards to the South West leg of the Henday said the concrete used there, would still be less expensive, than had they used asphalt, over the lifetime of the roadway. So why not use more of it???
Then lo and behold, I turn on CTV morning news a few days ago and it seems some researchers in Calgary have found a way to make concrete cheaper and stronger.
https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/university-of-calgary-researchers-creating-better-concrete-1.4851435
”Instead of using one tonne of your concrete, you may need to use 70 per cent of that, or even 50 per cent of that, and still achieve the very same properties that you're looking to achieve.” said Husein. ”Imagine how much saving that will happen in terms of energy consumption and material use if you're using nanoparticle cement. You can use half as much and get the same load bearing capacity.”
For some reason however, these guys see capping oil wells as their number one market, but in my opinion roadways (and even sidewalks) seem like a no-brainer. If even the original concrete, though more expensive at the outset, is typically cheaper in the long run, then surely this new concrete tips the scales in favour of it. Why would we not use it?
Then lo and behold, I turn on CTV morning news a few days ago and it seems some researchers in Calgary have found a way to make concrete cheaper and stronger.
https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/university-of-calgary-researchers-creating-better-concrete-1.4851435
”Instead of using one tonne of your concrete, you may need to use 70 per cent of that, or even 50 per cent of that, and still achieve the very same properties that you're looking to achieve.” said Husein. ”Imagine how much saving that will happen in terms of energy consumption and material use if you're using nanoparticle cement. You can use half as much and get the same load bearing capacity.”
For some reason however, these guys see capping oil wells as their number one market, but in my opinion roadways (and even sidewalks) seem like a no-brainer. If even the original concrete, though more expensive at the outset, is typically cheaper in the long run, then surely this new concrete tips the scales in favour of it. Why would we not use it?
Attachments
Last edited: