Well if what he says is technically correct, then there is a real problem. Of course, one undeveloped site while unfortunate, is not the only or greatest problem the city has to deal with.
However, I get the sense his real crime here may be stirring the pot to much or embarrassing those who for whatever reasons haven't been able to deal with this or similar sites so far.
However, the civic election is over and there will not be one for several years, so not quite sure what else he really expects to accomplish, other than bring some attention to such problems.
So I would still say to those in our civic government, be smart and get on with fixing this and related problems, this is really the best way to make the problematic messenger go away.
