I shouldn’t be spending the time writing to respond this (feeding the troll) but here we go.
Two things can be true at the same time.
1) Photo radar reduces speeding and crashes and road deaths. This is cannot be reasonably argued against. The literature/evidence is robust.
Also a real life example in Edmonton: photo radar was curtailed and rates of speeding and roads deaths subsequently increased.
2) Funds generated from photo radar (money collected from people breaking the law and making our streets less enjoyable and more dangerous) were used for initiatives to improve street safety and design and screetscapes (in this instance, patios.)
Now those funds are gone.
Programs like the patio program cost money.
Feel free to argue that the money should come out of general revenues (ie “property taxes”), but recognize that the only reason this discussion is happening and restaurants are having to pay for their patio space is because of decisions made by the UCP.