The_Cat
Senior Member
Take some responsibility, Regency. You could have demolished the whole site, and replaced it with grass, like the old Johnstone Walker site at Jasper and 102 Street.
Their statements in the Journal article also seem a bit misleading to me. The city encouraged them to decide quickly about tearing down the old building here because of the LRT construction schedule, but it did not force the developer to do. There is a difference and this is yet another bad example of what happens when things are torn down in haste.Take some responsibility, Regency. You could have demolished the whole site, and replaced it with grass, like the old Johnstone Walker site at Jasper and 102 Street.
F***ing finallyNo picture but for sale sign went up today on the nw corner! Omada I think.





That would be the most sensible approach if feasible. However I would also say that if you’re trying to build a 50 story skyscraper with multiple floors of underground parking, it would likely pose a significant obstacle to work around.^
Or you do what Ruth’s Chris did with the ones in their basement space and simply repurpose it. All it would take would be a bit of additional underpinning.
He says he is, but I'll believe when it's sold. I do not trust Raj at allSo it's true? Raj is selling???
I don't know him, but given his record with this and some other projects I can understand the sentiment. However, I would also like to be optimistic and hope that some of the negative feedback had led him to realize it would be better to exit this and leave it someone else who perhaps has a better ability to carry forward a major project here, given the challenges faced with the site.He says he is, but I'll believe when it's sold. I do not trust Raj at all
I saw it yeserday when I rode by it. It was indeed a glorious sight to see. I wonder how much it's listed for. Can't find any info on it Omada's site.Went by today to see that Glorious For sale sign