News   Apr 03, 2020
 7.4K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 8K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 2.6K     0 

Urban Sky's latest activity

  • U
    Urban Sky replied to the thread VIA Rail.
    Keep in mind that we are talking about accommodation types for train services where only 40% rather than 80% of the time spent on board...
  • U
    Urban Sky replied to the thread Quebec-Windsor Corridor.
    I would assume that they will be retired and kept for spare parts (i.e., canibalized to extend spare part availability for the ETC...
  • U
    Urban Sky replied to the thread Quebec-Windsor Corridor.
    The last Corridor Renaissance set seems to disappear next month, making the QMOs all-Siemens...
    • IMG_5235.jpeg
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to lenaitch's post in the thread General railway discussions with Like Like.
    Do you own mutual funds or have RSPs? Even your CPP contributions. They are only able to grow as investments by the traded companies...
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to Dan416's post in the thread General railway discussions with Like Like.
    Of course corporations are going to maximize their profits. But the fact that the railways sell off their ROWs and then governments...
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to dowlingm's post in the thread VIA Rail with Like Like.
    then you are relying on the different manufacturers delivering their products in similar timeframes so that consists could be fully...
  • U
    Urban Sky replied to the thread General railway discussions.
    From what I recall, the way how Canadian property tax rules value tracks much higher than the land on which they are built, creates a...
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to lenaitch's post in the thread General railway discussions with Like Like.
    It works in the sense that it allows them to be competitive because the don't have to carry the costs of property and infrastructure...
  • U
    Urban Sky replied to the thread VIA Rail.
    I doubt that they can legally pull off a joint procurement, especially given that they are subject to different trade agreements (e.g...
  • U
    Urban Sky replied to the thread VIA Rail.
    I can‘t find it in the RFQ I posted, but IIRC, such a configuration was explicitly allowed, provided that the bidding consortium would...
  • U
    Urban Sky replied to the thread VIA Rail.
    Indeed, the RFQ only asked for „trainsets“ (with mentions of locomotives only when describing its legacy fleet)...
    • IMG_5233.jpeg
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to smallspy's post in the thread VIA Rail with Like Like.
    As I understand it, the RFP looked for trainsets, but did not specify their precise composition. Self-propelled equipment was allowed...
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to rbt's post in the thread VIA Rail with Like Like.
    Indeed. It's not even the first agency in Canada to have requirements like that. UP Express had similar requirements.
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to urbancog's post in the thread VIA Rail with Like Like.
    Those aren't unreasonable RfP requirements.
  • U
    Urban Sky reacted to smallspy's post in the thread General railway discussions with Like Like.
    Indeed, and that is a big rabbit hole that one could go down. Or showing lines by movements. Or passenger ridership. Etc., ad naseum...

Back
Top