Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Calendar
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
News
Apr 03, 2020
From the Editor: A Message to Our Readers
7.4K
3
News
Apr 02, 2020
Topping Off March 2020: What's Hot on SkyriseEdmonton
8K
0
News
Apr 02, 2020
News Roundup for April 2, 2020
2.6K
0
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Urban Sky's latest activity
U
Urban Sky
replied to the thread
VIA Rail
.
Keep in mind that we are talking about accommodation types for train services where only 40% rather than 80% of the time spent on board...
Apr 22, 2024
U
Urban Sky
replied to the thread
Quebec-Windsor Corridor
.
I would assume that they will be retired and kept for spare parts (i.e., canibalized to extend spare part availability for the ETC...
Apr 22, 2024
U
Urban Sky
replied to the thread
Quebec-Windsor Corridor
.
The last Corridor Renaissance set seems to disappear next month, making the QMOs all-Siemens...
Apr 21, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
lenaitch's post
in the thread
General railway discussions
with
Like
.
Do you own mutual funds or have RSPs? Even your CPP contributions. They are only able to grow as investments by the traded companies...
Apr 20, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
Dan416's post
in the thread
General railway discussions
with
Like
.
Of course corporations are going to maximize their profits. But the fact that the railways sell off their ROWs and then governments...
Apr 20, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
dowlingm's post
in the thread
VIA Rail
with
Like
.
then you are relying on the different manufacturers delivering their products in similar timeframes so that consists could be fully...
Apr 20, 2024
U
Urban Sky
replied to the thread
General railway discussions
.
From what I recall, the way how Canadian property tax rules value tracks much higher than the land on which they are built, creates a...
Apr 20, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
lenaitch's post
in the thread
General railway discussions
with
Like
.
It works in the sense that it allows them to be competitive because the don't have to carry the costs of property and infrastructure...
Apr 20, 2024
U
Urban Sky
replied to the thread
VIA Rail
.
I doubt that they can legally pull off a joint procurement, especially given that they are subject to different trade agreements (e.g...
Apr 20, 2024
U
Urban Sky
replied to the thread
VIA Rail
.
I can‘t find it in the RFQ I posted, but IIRC, such a configuration was explicitly allowed, provided that the bidding consortium would...
Apr 19, 2024
U
Urban Sky
replied to the thread
VIA Rail
.
Indeed, the RFQ only asked for „trainsets“ (with mentions of locomotives only when describing its legacy fleet)...
Apr 19, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
smallspy's post
in the thread
VIA Rail
with
Like
.
As I understand it, the RFP looked for trainsets, but did not specify their precise composition. Self-propelled equipment was allowed...
Apr 19, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
rbt's post
in the thread
VIA Rail
with
Like
.
Indeed. It's not even the first agency in Canada to have requirements like that. UP Express had similar requirements.
Apr 19, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
urbancog's post
in the thread
VIA Rail
with
Like
.
Those aren't unreasonable RfP requirements.
Apr 19, 2024
U
Urban Sky
reacted to
smallspy's post
in the thread
General railway discussions
with
Like
.
Indeed, and that is a big rabbit hole that one could go down. Or showing lines by movements. Or passenger ridership. Etc., ad naseum...
Apr 19, 2024
Members
Back
Top