Beltline_B
Senior Member
True, in one sense 27 is a fair bit higher than 19. In another sense on a scale of 1-100 it’s not much higher.Fairly sure that 27% is actually still quite a bit higher than 19%. Perhaps good marketing can make it seem a lot better, however I would disagree that it is a red herring.
Of course office vacancy is not the only measure of success, although Edmonton's growth rate has been fairly strong recently too.
In the end though, the number itself doesn’t matter, it’s the effect of the number, and the reason I say it’s a red herring is that it hasn’t affected the vibrancy of downtown. It’s as busy as ever, and getting busier. Ironically the increase in the vacancy rate is having the opposite effect. The red herring was the low vacancy rate in past years.
For years a large percentage of Calgary’s B and C space was leased but was contingency space that was often empty. Sometimes used but if used, it was used very inefficiently. You’d be amazed at how much B and C space was used solely as storage!
The big increase in the vacancy rate is mostly in that older stock, and is really only a change on paper. Instead of office space that’s leased but empty, it’s now being turned into residential. 4,000 units currently, but the city wants to convert 6 million square feet by 2034, adding roughly 10000 units.
Nobody’s waiting for a corporate miracle, they’re creating their own residential miracle.