Prairie Sky Gondola | 76.2m | ?s | Prairie Sky | DIALOG

What do you think of this project?

  • Total voters
    59
northlands said:
One thing I will note about this project, unrelated to matters of Indigenous consultation and burial grounds, is a lot of Edmontonians very clearly have a very vocal disdain for any project of this innovative variety. All I've seen about it outside of this forum is endless uninformed rejection with zero attempt to even take two seconds to look into what exactly was being proposed here, and that has been the most disappointing part of all. Hell, if WEM was proposed today it'd never even get a sniff of a chance to get off the ground.

I know this sort of stuff happens everywhere all over, but man, Edmonton is just such an incredibly risk averse city.
Click to expand...
Once again Edmonton demonstrates that it is its own worst enemy and deserves every bit the reputation it has. Edmonton has been and continues to be a city that finds every way to not do get something done, or to get something done with very little imagination or vision, while other cities strive to find solutions to challenges to get stuff done.

What a small minded group of fckin morons on council.
 
I do wonder how this project got all the way up to phase 3 without certain questions being raised much earlier in the process. The gondola project could have been a victim of bad timing though. Sensitivity to indigenous issues/ concerns has heightened considerably from the time the framework for this project was approved back in 2018.
I really like this project but wished that there was more engagement with the Treaty 6 and 7 First Nations right from the start. That part of the process just seemed lacking for a project that was approved four years ago. Didn't have to cost much for initial engagement either with current digital meeting technology. Presentations could have been made and although not all, many questions could have been answered virtually with a plan to meet physically at a later date. ,That may have looked a lot better in front of council.

Opposition from the public of this project was mind blowing though. Regardless, I hope PSG doesn't give up on this one.
 
This was a very contentious debate, and Council had no easy decision here. This will be controversial, but I am supportive of engaging more with Indigenous Nations before proceeding further. This is what Council approved:
Council.PNG


It sounds pretty wholistic to me, and encompasses city strategies that someone else here pointed out. To me, this debate brings to mind the Oka Crisis/Kanesatake Resistance, where the Quebec town of Oka tried to expand its golf course on traditional Kanesatake burial grounds. First Nations resistors were derided as opponents of progress simply because they didn't want their ancestors' graves to be torn up and developed over by a golf course.

This is not as black and white; I am aware that some Indigenous leaders have spoken in favour of the gondola. But others have genuine concerns, and I think it's perfectly valid for council to say "Hey there, Edmonton has made some big mistakes in the past, but it's not too late to take a step back and try to break these colonial cycles."

I am still pro-gondola, I still want it to happen. But I want it to happen right. These sorts of things have been going on as long as colonial governments existed in Canada; traditional and sacred grounds were encroached upon - even burial grounds were built on - because settler projects were seen as inevitable marks of progress that were acceptable as long as the benefits to settler society outweighed the harms to Indigenous Peoples.

Edmonton has a chance to be a leader in Canada by doing something different here. If we want the Rossdale area to succeed in a way that we can be proud of, and that lets our children enjoy it with a clean conscious, then it is important to get consultations right and done in good faith, so that these debates around colonialism don't get baked into the development's DNA. I hope that when the time comes, the city steps up and supports PSG in this endeavour, rather than making them undertake it completely at their expense. I feel like that's a possibility, given the scope of the motion that passed.
 
The problem I have is that someone can now say their great great great grandparent died where a project that is beneficial to the city as a whole is planned to be built - killing the project.
Are ghosts from the past going to effect every decision we make? Where do we draw the line on this? Are we allowed to physically move graveyards (this includes non-natives graveyards)?
 
It's clear that more significant, meaningful consultation with indigenous folks was not done prior to this land agreement. Sohi basically said there are other projects that have done it and got buy-in.

That said, when you're trying to do a private development like this it might not be possible to have the resources to do all the consultation required. It was probably the right move for Councillor Paquette to get the City to do more consultation through Touch The Water, West Rossdale Business Plan, etc.

What is lost in this is that this was supposed to be a fun, exciting project that everyone in the City could get behind. Since winning the Edmonton Project, it doesn't seem to have gone that way. I do wonder why. It can't just be due to the hurdles of developing in Rossdale.
 
itom987 said:
The problem I have is that someone can now say their great great great grandparent died where a project that is beneficial to the city as a whole is planned to be built - killing the project.
Click to expand...
I personally disagree. I think that if we are to truly get past our colonial ways, and abandon practices that have been recognized as genocidal, that includes understanding that Indigenous concerns run far deeper than petty complaints about where so-and-so died. If a foreign power occupied Canada and started building on graveyards where your ancestors are buried, I'm sure you wouldn't be too pleased with that either.

And keep in mind, the voices we heard in opposition to this weren't because they didn't want any development there whatsoever. They're asking for a genuine seat at the table as equals, rather than to have a box checked off, and they want to ensure that there's nobody buried on the sites that are built on. I don't think that's asking too much.
 
One of the concerns expressed was about the fares as per Coun. Salvador and noted by Coun. Janz.
"... I am not confident that the fee structure will be fair, equitable, and affordable... While council has been provided verbal answers concerning the rates frequent riders would pay versus tourists, the reality is, those fares could change at any time over the course of the next 90 years in order to generate additional revenue."

The Portland gondola is $6 return trip and PSG was suggesting about $2 one way for locals.
Our high level street car is $7 return trip for an adult. How is that considered more fair, equitable and affordable in relation to the gondola? And is that high level Streetcar fare locked in for 90 years? I mean what if they raise the fee?

I love the streetcar so not complaining about the fee, just bringing it up because it seems a different standard is being applied to PSG from council in regards to affordability/equity?
 
What baffles me is that the issue of how to preserve the powerplant didn't seem to be top of mind here. I understand that the potential graves are a key point here, but surely so is the powerplant. What's plan b now? Who is going to put any money into activating the plant if there is no easy way to get there? If this ends up getting torn down because of this I'm seriously going to move away. Everyone has a breaking point.
 
Didama said:
If this ends up getting torn down because of this I'm seriously going to move away. Everyone has a breaking point.
Click to expand...

As a resident of downtown who is already frustrated by the the social disorder, the City's general lack of ability to provide basic municipal services like cleanliness, and council's general ridiculous lack of direction (replacing mosquito spraying with bats, defunding then refunding the police), and now this with the gondola, I can empathize with you because I am at my breaking point with Edmonton as a whole.

It is getting tougher and tougher to defend this city and I am at my breaking point as well unfortunately.
 
northlands said:
I highly doubt torn down (mostly just thanks to demo costs) but I can see it being stuck in limbo for another decade or two yet.
Click to expand...
Easily at least that long sadly. I just hope it doesn't get to a point of disrepair where they determine it isn't feasible to be saved.
 
TAS said:
One of the concerns expressed was about the fares as per Coun. Salvador and noted by Coun. Janz.
"... I am not confident that the fee structure will be fair, equitable, and affordable... While council has been provided verbal answers concerning the rates frequent riders would pay versus tourists, the reality is, those fares could change at any time over the course of the next 90 years in order to generate additional revenue."

The Portland gondola is $6 return trip and PSG was suggesting about $2 one way for locals.
Our high level street car is $7 return trip for an adult. How is that considered more fair, equitable and affordable in relation to the gondola? And is that high level Streetcar fare locked in for 90 years? I mean what if they raise the fee?

I love the streetcar so not complaining about the fee, just bringing it up because it seems a different standard is being applied to PSG from council in regards to affordability/equity?
Click to expand...
Portland isn't in Canada, so they do not use the same currency. Given the round numbers used, I suspect the differential currency rates are not accounted for.

So, $6 US is around $7.70 Cdn.
 
Lost all my hope in this city. I dread every time I have to go to work downtown. Learnt to love my suburb. At least it’s clean.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top