Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates

What do you think of this project?

  • Total voters
    52
IMG_0845.JPG
 
IanO said:
View attachment 710059
Click to expand...
Yeah, it sucks now and it'll suck after, I get it. But this could easily be a green space, maybe some basketball hoops, food trucks, as a temporary measure before anything is built. Positioning this as a win for downtown when you know it is nothing but a cash grab for Westerich, perhaps indefinitely, is lame.
 
Dubas said:
Yeah, it sucks now and it'll suck after, I get it. But this could easily be a green space, maybe some basketball hoops, food trucks, as a temporary measure before anything is built. Positioning this as a win for downtown when you know it is nothing but a cash grab for Westerich, perhaps indefinitely, is lame.
Click to expand...
Why don't you buy the land and build your vision? Easy (and boring) to carp from the sidelines. Boring.
 
positive1 said:
Why don't you buy the land and build your vision? Easy (and boring) to carp from the sidelines. Boring.
Click to expand...
You seem to be forgetting that it will be taxpayer dollars paid by those on the sidelines that will end up paying for this… :(

If this is what it takes for Westrich to be able to afford to buy it from Regency, those sideline dollars will end up in Regency’s pockets as a reward for bestowing this on us .
 
Dubas said:
Yeah, it sucks now and it'll suck after, I get it. But this could easily be a green space, maybe some basketball hoops, food trucks, as a temporary measure before anything is built. Positioning this as a win for downtown when you know it is nothing but a cash grab for Westerich, perhaps indefinitely, is lame.
Click to expand...
Exactly my thoughts. Put a basketball court there in the summer and try for an ice rink in the winter, at least until it's ready for build out.
 
Well as I said earlier with The Shack on the corner that's one hopeful business that can be there for a while at least and the parking lots could have some food trucks and a temporary basketball or some sort of other courts could be also put in there so I guess we'll see if the space can be better utilized. The sad thing is, there are probably a few people out there that will be so happy to see a parking lot right there, for their own usage.
 
1. “Hopefully the market conditions improve for a building there one day”
2. “Well at least it's not just a parking lot, there will be retail”
3. “I hear exciting coffee place is opening up a location in the seacan”
4. “I hope the coffee shop can expand its hours, its annoying that it closes at 3pm”
5. “I noticed the shop is now closed up, anyone hear anything?”
6. “Hopefully something else can open up in the space”
7. “Retail at that corner can’t make it in the current market”
8. “There's a permit in for removing the seacan and adding a few more spots”
Repeat Cycle

We are currently at step 2 of the timeline
 
^ nailed it.

I mean no disrespect to Westrich, but this is akin to making a deal with the devil.

We get arguably the greatest eyesore in the city cleaned up and ownership is transferred to a company who has developed more inner-city space in Edmonton than any other company in the past ten years.

In exchange, we walk back on numerous planning and land use principles and best practices, potentially setting ugly precedent in the process, while receiving no guarantee to see anything built beyond a seacan and pavement.
 
Ohman said:
1. “Hopefully the market conditions improve for a building there one day”
2. “Well at least it's not just a parking lot, there will be retail”
3. “I hear exciting coffee place is opening up a location in the seacan”
4. “I hope the coffee shop can expand its hours, its annoying that it closes at 3pm”
5. “I noticed the shop is now closed up, anyone hear anything?”
6. “Hopefully something else can open up in the space”
7. “Retail at that corner can’t make it in the current market”
8. “There's a permit in for removing the seacan and adding a few more spots”
Repeat Cycle

We are currently at step 2 of the timeline
Click to expand...
1769022533638.png
 
northlands said:
^ nailed it.

I mean no disrespect to Westrich, but this is akin to making a deal with the devil.

We get arguably the greatest eyesore in the city cleaned up and ownership is transferred to a company who has developed more inner-city space in Edmonton than any other company in the past ten years.

In exchange, we walk back on numerous planning and land use principles and best practices, potentially setting ugly precedent in the process, while receiving no guarantee to see anything built beyond a seacan and pavement.
Click to expand...
Sadly I fear you are correct. With Westrich the lot will get developed eventually, but it'll be a 6 storey wood frame project that would easily blend into Sherwood Park. On the other hand getting rid of empty lots is still a priority for Edmonton.
 
I’m not saying I support this…but people act like we didn’t get Ultima and Encore from westrich. Two of our better condos downtown. I don’t think it’s fair to act like they couldn’t do something solid here. Lots of other lots/lane owners we can pick on more imo. 104ave has a dozen between 100st and 112st. South of jasper has another dozen.

Emerald site/motorlands/124th and jasper corner?

Lots of land we gotta get developed. At least westrich has some pockets, a level of presence locally, and a consistent track record of building this decade.

Windsor park tower anybody? Not a bad proposal…
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top