Metro Line LRT | ?m | ?s | City of Edmonton

fromtraintotower said:
I found this article and it doesn't make much sense to me.
edmontonjournal.com

City may lose skilled trades if LRT expansion stops, warns contractor

"It seems the city's going to run out of momentum for rail projects after this one. We would like to have a job after this."
edmontonjournal.com edmontonjournal.com

Like... do they know about the Metro Line expansion? Yes, Phase 2 (NAIT to Castle Downs) is currently in land acquisition, but construction should be coming soon, especially when Yellowhead freeway conversion finishes in around 2027. Valley Line West construction should finish by 2029, so they'll definitely have another LRT project waiting for them.
Click to expand...

I hope this is this case!

It will all depend on whether or not there is money for construction. Phase 2 of the Metro Line will almost certainly need provincial and federal dollars and that has not yet been committed.

We’ll see what happens in the four year budget, for 2027-2030, upcoming later this year.

There are, of course, also plans for developing BRT, which will also need funding.

Hopefully both BRT and LRT expansion can move ahead without significant delay.
 
Last edited:
I think that the City should at least have a goal to build the LRT bridge to 113A Street and possibly to Castle Downs, something like the plans for Yellowhead/66 Street. Any future LRT could be built in shorter sections.
 
Last edited:
Well if I could have my way I would get the Northwest LRT to St Albert started and gets the St Albert portion that was planned long time ago as well to get started, I would get the south side started from Ellerslie station to at least the planned station southwards and maybe even through the airport, I would look at further expansion of the Valley Line to further east or south and also further west on the other end. I'd even add the line that was linked to a Valley Line that would go from the U of A to Bonnie Doon and into Sherwood Park. And then also a potential line either with low floor or high floor out to the Windermere Town Center area. Unfortunately all that stuff requires a lot of money and the City has had to partner with different levels of government. As much as it's easy to say we got to keep on building if the money isn't there I highly doubt that a big increase in taxes would be acceptable for most people in order to build more LRT. I agree we have to keep momentum and I think we are doing that for the most part. The fact that we got the two NAIT stations and now the two Capital lines stations is something that I was not expecting to happen while the Valley Line was being built, so I'm actually somewhat satisfied of our progress. Could it be faster do I want it faster sure, will that happen, only time can tell.
 
I often wonder if BRT to Castle Downs will change the budgetary math. Is it as attractive to spend big dollars to build a Metro Line bridge over the CN tracks when the Capital Line can be extended further south toward the airport for less money? Does the political consensus to serve the NW stay the same once BRT is effectively serving Castle Downs?

And just as importantly, does the UCP government simply decide for us that they are only funding a connection to the airport? There is precident for this with what they did to Calgary's Green Line, which again leads to a Capital Line extention far south as the next section built.
 
The airport connection is the most crucial, along with the University Ave grade separation or closure.

For the price of a single underground station on the planned Castle Downs metro expansion, you could build a Valley Line West spur feeding 124th St and the west side of Blatchford.

The CN crossing is a rare situation where TBM must be cheaper than a bridge.
 
YEG imagineer said:
Although not LRT, the AB rail plan will be out sometime and with that could be high speed rail, regional rail which would keep this workforce going if the funding is in place.
Click to expand...
That’s not quite an apples to apples comparison. Urban LRT construction requires concrete track slabs, tight utility constraints, etc. Whereas intercity/regional rail would most likely use ballasted track. There is already a large talent pool working for/contracted by CN and CPKC building/designing tracks for their networks. There would be some overlap in skill sets, but I think the people working on the Valley Line are better suited to urban LRT projects.

Barnaby said:
The CN crossing is a rare situation where TBM must be cheaper than a bridge.
Click to expand...
Not according to the city. They say tunnelling is still more expensive since they would have to build special reinforced tunnels to mitigate vibrations from the train yard above. Not sure how accurate that assessment is though. Selfishly, I want to see that bridge built because it would become another iconic symbol of the city, and just look so cool from the Yellowhead.
 
chrisvazquez7 said:
That’s not quite an apples to apples comparison. Urban LRT construction requires concrete track slabs, tight utility constraints, etc. Whereas intercity/regional rail would most likely use ballasted track. There is already a large talent pool working for/contracted by CN and CPKC building/designing tracks for their networks. There would be some overlap in skill sets, but I think the people working on the Valley Line are better suited to urban LRT projects.


Not according to the city. They say tunnelling is still more expensive since they would have to build special reinforced tunnels to mitigate vibrations from the train yard above. Not sure how accurate that assessment is though. Selfishly, I want to see that bridge built because it would become another iconic symbol of the city, and just look so cool from the Yellowhead.
Click to expand...
And helps provide active transportation options. Much harder with tunnels.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top