_urbanite
Senior Member
You sure you don't mean Midwest = Maclab? Mainstreet is a Calgary company AFAIKMaintreet = Maclab
You sure you don't mean Midwest = Maclab? Mainstreet is a Calgary company AFAIKMaintreet = Maclab
If I am not mistaken, Midwest had bought a controlling stake on Mainstreet a few years back, but I might be wrong.You sure you don't mean Midwest = Maclab? Mainstreet is a Calgary company AFAIK

I mean, not as many hotels DT as we'd like, but I would still take it as a 40-50 story condo/rental tower with units ranging from bachelors to 3 bedrooms, too.And there’s still many many lots nearby for hotel or hotel apartment.
With Edmonton's trajectory these days, I would say the best you'll see is Ever Red: clapboard plus. They have got to be one of the most ghetto developers I've ever seen.This has been for sale before.
Really hope someone with the ability to deliver a project buys this!
Any guesses?
Westrich? Cidex? Qualico? Maclab?
Someone from outside of Edmonton?
It feels very reasonable, although considering how much remediation/demo work will be needed to actually develop the site, $6M is probably on the high end of realistic, and will probably be discounted if someone makes a serious proposal.![]()
Downtown Core Development Land - Omada Commercial
Downtown Core Development Land On behalf of the Vendor, we are pleased to release this unique downtown land parcel for sale. 10199 101 Street is ideally situated in the heart of Edmonton’s financial core and the dense downtown neighborhood. This site is an opportunity for a developer to...omada-cre.com
I know nothing about development land pricing, but 6 mil seems reasonable
Potential buyers would not be getting the nice tennis court green bare lot as shown in the picture, but I suspect most of them already realize that.It feels very reasonable, although considering how much remediation/demo work will be needed to actually develop the site, $6M is probably on the high end of realistic, and will probably be discounted if someone makes a serious proposal.
It absolutely needs to be tall. Otherwise, it'll be consumed by its surroundings and become nondescript.My guess is up at the recommendations of legal counsel to demonstrate they are trying to do something. This is not the first time if I recall this property has been listed.
As for what could go there, I’m not even obsessed with height here, great street presence with mid rise boutique type hotel with awesome amenities and I’m all in. We have lots of land to develop, this doesn’t need to be tall.
Tall would be nice, but a high quality shorter high-rise or even a midrise could become much more of a landmark and create much more interest from a street view perspective than an uninspired tall building.It absolutely needs to be tall. Otherwise, it'll be consumed by its surroundings and become nondescript.
To clarify I am thinking on the taller end of the definition of mid rise,, so 12-15 stories here. We need to see this developed in a great way, but expecting Edmonton to suddenly pop up another 40-50 story building just doesn’t seem realistic.It absolutely needs to be tall. Otherwise, it'll be consumed by its surroundings and become nondescript.
I'm not for tall, for tall's sake. I'm saying that anything like a mid-rise would get swallowed by its surroundings and feel claustrophobic. As a residential site, that'd be oppressive.To clarify I am thinking on the taller end of the definition of mid rise,, so 12-15 stories here. We need to see this developed in a great way, but expecting Edmonton to suddenly pop up another 40-50 story building just doesn’t seem realistic.
Great architecture doesn’t get lost if it’s not tall. Hell, this forum would go crazy to have Tegler back on this corner, and it wasn’t tall. We have ample space to develop downtown, very little of it is going to be developed over 15-20 stories in my opinion.