Tower 101 | 175m | 50s | Regency Developments | DER + Associates

What do you think of this project?


  • Total voters
    50

Knack calls the site an “embarrassment.”

Talks about expanding the derelict property subclass to include non residential properties.

Expanding the derelict property subclass to include non residential properties should have been done a couple of years ago. Lord knows there are other properties such as The Emerald and The Arlington.
 
^ What I mean is "stop whining and get behind a solution!"

Expanding the derelict property subclass to include non residential properties should have been done a couple of years ago. Lord knows there are other properties such as The Emerald and The Arlington.

He said expansion of the derelict property subclass to include non residential properties is scheduled to pass through council next year and take effect for the 2027 tax season, although if there was any way they could have it ready for the 2026 tax season he would push for it.
 
How I feel whenever I hear Raj Dhunna whine about anything:

1762580333326.png
 
“There’s a way to make that site look much, much tidier, even if you have to leave some of the structural elements in,” [Anne Stevenson] said. “I’ve been meeting with the property owner for years, basically since I was first elected. We would meet, I’d sort of hear a commitment to make some changes, and it just repeatedly seems not to happen.

“The property owner has invested in wraparounds in the fencing. But we’re just in a cycle where the wraps get put up and they get torn down. Nothing’s actually addressing the overall look of the site.”

Stevenson said she told Regency in March that she would be asking city staff about “enforcement options” when it comes to the BMO site.
Aaand that's why you're being targeted, Regency.
 

Back
Top